Search found 36 matches for Molly Q.

Game 28: Guess Who?

Aya Y. wrote:
Molly Q. wrote:it would have been nice if it was more clear that scum only had night com :/ gg i guess I'm really salty though lol

It's stated clearly in the mafiascum page about the theme.

w/e I'm bad LOL but still salty about other people who did not play well >.>

Game 28: Guess Who?

it would have been nice if it was more clear that scum only had night com :/ gg i guess I'm really salty though lol

Game 28: Guess Who?

Molly Q. wrote:if aya grimm was the scumteam wow, wilma deserved the idiot of the year award lol..

also why no quickhammer when wilma was an idiot

i played much better than people will give me credit for imo, just other people being absolute idiots screwed me up

sorry if this post comes off as mean lol but it's true

Game 28: Guess Who?

if aya grimm was the scumteam wow, wilma deserved the idiot of the year award lol..

Game 28: Guess Who?

I'm not trying to pressure you to lynch Wilma but like if you lynch her now the possibility of a stealth is non-existent (assuming you are not scum)... deadline is in 12 hours...

Game 28: Guess Who?

not sure how much I'll be able to get on before deadline tomorrow, I'm pretty busy. I will be short and sweet but it's pretty clear that today's lynch should be Wilma, not me, for all of the reasons I have previously stated. If you want more of my, according to Wilma, "non-existent reasoning," read back a few pages. I feel no need to say anything else.

Make sure to get plurality off me and do it soon so the second mafia member can't stealth lynch!

Game 28: Guess Who?

as in, in the case that I am town (I am!), I have 100% reason to lynch wilma. just clarifying.

Game 28: Guess Who?

actually, that is incorrect, it is most absolutely a reason to scumread wilma.

The fact that she lynched me and scum didn't quick hammer confirms her as scum to me. Because I know I'm town, I know scum doesn't have enough people to quick hammer, and therefore she must be scum.

Yesterday with nathaniel I think I had perfectly fine reasoning, but you're correct, you CAN debate that; my reason for lynching Wilma is NOT debatable.

Game 28: Guess Who?

I agree with Mrs. Grimm on Aya + Wilma as the most probable scum team at this point, with Wilma + Mrs. Grimm being second most likely and Wilma + Lulu being improbable due to their early interactions. However, just emphasizing the fact that Wilma choked by lynching me and then saying that she regrets her lynch; because scum didn't quick hammer, in theory, if she were town, I would be confirmed scum to her. Luckily I know she's not so yeah, just everyone note when deadline is because I don't want to be hammered by the other scum member due to plurality.

Game 28: Guess Who?

I'm not unlynching, Wilma recklessly lynched first even though it was clearly LYLO. Since I know I'm town, I know she's mafia. Literally it's a 50/50 between me and Wilma, but that thing about not realizing it was LYLO? Absolute BULLSHIT. It should be clear that because she recklessly lynched first that she is mafia, not me.

Game 28: Guess Who?

I LITERALLY ANSWERED (almost maybe i missed one???) EVERY QUESTION YOU'VE EVER ASKED ME. like half my posts have been pondering why don't realize this...

additionally you have yet to respond to me asking why my reads don't make sense, a point which is extremely unclear; generally you don't explain anything you say lol.

Additionally I know wilma is scum because he choked by lynching me, risking the QH. So yeah it's down to a 50/50 between wilma and I now, choose who you want but notice how I always explain myself and she never does.

Lynch Wilma F.

Game 28: Guess Who?

honestly also Lulu hasn't been so great in the past few days despite me initially townreading her, and Grimm's response to my post was good, so I know this is a pretty quick read change, but I'm gonna read through this thread later today and do scumteams

Game 28: Guess Who?

go ahead, lynch me. but take a second to think for yourself: why would I ever keep the same scumread for DAYS on end, despite getting absolutely nowhere with my argument? Wouldn't a mafia member change his read so it's easier for him to get someone, other than themself, lynched? I GUARANTEE you someone is going to act as if my scumread being wrong is my fault and lynch me for it.

Just some food for thought. As far as scum teams go, Grimm + Wilma/Aya is what I'm looking at right now. Explanation later, but honestly that random bw from grimm was kinda scummy even if it did result in the person who I scumread getting lynched. I will explain partners later but yeah

Game 28: Guess Who?

besides the blatant omgus and attempt to take down someone who is being increasingly more commonly scumread, what would make you think that I would "blatantly buddy" with lulu and then we would be scumbuddies. That would honestly make no sense. Additionally I'm not trying to pick from the low-hanging fruit (aka mrs. grimm days 1-3) so why is that scummy? Why is scumreading the same person as me scummy?

and Aya, how is scumreading someone and lynching them unnatural? what am I supposed to do, change my read because you don't agree with me?

just some questions I'd like you to answer.

Game 28: Guess Who?

what am I supposed to explain? I wasn't GOING to respond to Aya's reads but I guess I will now, but first, to nathaniel's post:

give me PROOF that my allegations of you aren't true. you claim they aren't, even though they clearly are. the allegations are as follows, for some people who DIDN'T READ THE GAME LOL

- your reads don't have content (they don't, just read them. they are like "neutral" or "I'm not really sure" or "agree with everyone else, even when" no one else has a distinct read
- you went inactive when the main argument wasn't about you. yes some of it was those two days but it was for more than two days
- you are incredibly, incredibly defensive

ok now aya's read against me, which I repeat I wasn't going to respond to but I guess Wilma wants me to?

"I've touched on her a bit in above reads, but I will go into more detail here. I'd like to go into detail on her issue with Nathaniel at the moment since she seems convinced he is scum. She accused him of being active day 1 to avoid being suspicious, and also suspect him for being defensive when he was getting pressured. Another serious issue she had with him was his inactivity streak from 3/10 to 3/15, accusing him of trying to stay under the radar, when previously she accused him of trying to do the same thing by being active. Which one is it? Also, she stated that he was inactive longer than he said he would be. He said he would be unable to post on 3/11 and 3/12, which proved true as he did not post during this time. He did not post on either 3/13 or 3/13 since it was night phase during that time and posting would have been in violation of the rules. He was then the second person to post the next day. I don't see where the problem is."

this paragraph is blatantly false. please read the game. Nathaniel was inactive for those two days but also MORE THAN THAT, and it was right after I started to scumread wilma instead. additionally I have not been tunneling nathaniel. he is just my top scumread on days 1 and 3/4, whereas wilma was on day 2. He still hasn't died because you guys are idiots and continue to lynch town, so I still lynch him. it's simple.

"Her issue with Wilma stems from a belief that she has a lack of content in her posts. I've covered in my Wilma read that she has had plenty of content recently and her seeming lack of such content made sense beforehand based on how she seems to be making her reads (she uses what people says to make reads on them, and most of her "contentless" posts are on day 1/early day 2)."

honestly this is true, her contentless posts were all early. that doesn't change my read on her because her posts recently haven't been that good contributions either lol. (in fact, she's been very inactive, which doesn't matter but that's not the point). check out her most recent post. it basically says:

WOW activity, molly explain yourself(????), says she wants to lynch me because... i have reasons for my lynches WOAH and then talks to nathaniel about how he said that she shouldn't quote stuff. if you call this quality content then I would be surprised.

"Molly, I'd like to say something directly to you at this point. In a post Wilma made, which you obviously saw since you responded to it, she asked you what "your idea of context" is and you never bothered to answer her. It's possible that you missed that part of the post like you missed Nathaniel's inactivity announcement but I'd find that hard to believe since it was right at the beginning of the "content" of her post. I can see that you sort of answered it in a roundabout way in your next post when referring to Guy and Lulu's reads, but I think Wilma wanted a more direct answer considering how she has mostly been ignored this game."

i did say I missed nathaniel's inactivity post. I forgot what page it's on but I said it. but he was inactive for more than that, and it's not the inactivity that matters, it's the fact that it was right when I decided to scumread wilma instead of him.

"Sorry this got to be such a long read, but I wanted to cover her two main scumreads so far since that is a majority of what her posts have been about so far. Leaning scum, but only because of her scumreads. Most of what she has said otherwise has been well thought out and despite stating otherwise it really feels like she is tunneling Nathaniel."

i've already explained why your perception that I am tunneling nathaniel is blatantly incorrect. he is simply my top scumread. if anything going against what other people are saying should be a town-y thing to do.

---

that is all for now. I will tolerate someone lynching me if they come up with a reason that's not bullshit (i.e. you can't say it's because I'm "tunneling nathaniel" or that "my reads are bad."

Game 28: Guess Who?

Lynch Nathaniel E.

yeah yesterday honestly cemented this for me, I don't see a scenario where he isn't scum. this isn't even tunneling at this point, it's just me having a consistent scumread. also I saw someone lynched me yesterday and even though it was for a dumb reason (inactivity does not influence my reads, citation: mrs. grimm) i still didn't comment. so calling me defensive is really not right lol

Game 28: Guess Who?

if I'm supposed to respond to your reads post then I like how you explained your lynches but I don't see a lot of YOUR content in it. I see just a lot of agreeing with other people and neutral reads, which is a little scummy to me. If it's this post...

If it's your most recent post... I think it's that in hindsight... first of all I never hated you for not talking for a day. you were inactive for a large chunk of day 2 and I missed the post where you said you weren't going to be active. please. You were also inactive for longer than that and that was kinda fishy (that explains my first point which I guess you didn't understand??). The rest of your post is just you being SALTY AS FUCK because you are being scumread LOL it's funny because you don't understand how busy I am rn

finally I'd like to note that a mirror serena lynch is fine at this point, as her most recent posts also have little to no content, despite her saying "I finally have time to be active" now.

Additionally I think we should check in on Mrs. Grimm, aj isn't subbing her so she's clearly doing something...

Game 28: Guess Who?

Steveland W. wrote:So in this post I'd like to assess Molly's lynch reasons on Nathaniel but there is something I wish to address within my post first so the first thing I did notice within one of your more recent posts is that that you believe I ignored the fact that you were on Wilma for a majority of the day yesterday (This is something that I did miss) So I was looking through some posts (I may or may not have missed one I was looking for sorta specific ones dont kill me on missing 1) The ones I was paying more attention to were the ones involving you stating reasons to lynch Nathaniel / lynching him so during day 1 the reasoning there was for generally useless posts / filler (Atm I believe this reason is out the window since I think its obvious to say that his posts aren't really useless) Next there was also the BW so the thing I did see is that he did give his reasoning for lynching Muramasa (Reasoning was for not defending himself and since he wasnt contributing so its kinda justafiable for him to lynch him rather than it being a BW) The next thing you had said about him was that he didnt give his opinion on the current lynch situation, but yet when he had lynched Muramasa he kinda did give his opinion there with saying how they should be lynched if they arent going to contribute or defend themself. Next another thing for a reason you said was that he suddenly stopped posting (He did say he wouldnt be here for a bit, and yes he also did correct you and you also did acknowledge that you didnt see that post but that is one of the reasonings that you pointed out so I do want to include that) Finally you say that Wilma and him are passively fine with whatever the other person does, honestly I feel as if this reason isnt a super condemming reason to lynch Nathaniel as this is the only reason that I can find that cant really be refuted at this point. Honestly he's not that good of a lynch and like Aya had said he gives helpful information, and in my own opinion I quite like the way he assesses people's reads, and other information people bring up (I did like his contribution on the reads that I had given) Mainly the purpose of this post if for me to bring to light the reasons you've ever given for Nathaniel to be lynched, and theres really only 1 reason that cant be refuted at this point, so I dont find a Nathaniel Lynch to be very good for the town at this point in time considering how there's only 1 reason that I've been able to find where as there's people that have more reasoning to be lynched if there was a reasoning that you gave that I missed please let me know I'd be more than happy to assess it within a post

I do intend to hopefully be able to look through some more things tomorrow and bring more information to the table I do wish to respond to Nathaniels comments about my reads which I will do in another post most likely tomorrow (Tomorrow for me)

i disagree, although I like your analysis of the situation. I have plenty of reasons to still be lynching Nathaniel. The main assumption that you are making is that his posts are useful, and you imply that this is not debatable. Actually, this is not true. For example, just on this page, from top to bottom:

- reminded me that he was inactive because he left for a few days (but didn't note that he was inactive for a longer time than that)
- said that I was attacking him for his inactivity, I was attacking him for his SUDDEN inactivity once he WAS NOT A FOCUS OF THE MAIN CONFLICT to AVOID ATTENTION. let's read people
- quotes a post of mine and asks me clarifying questions (I guess this one is ok)
- notes that I SAID SOMETHING and that HE WILL LOOK AT IT (lol if this isn't useless I don't know what is)
- then he finally does reads after I've been pressuring him to do any content at all for the last few in game days! wow! BUT then he kinda just agrees with a lot of my reads and doesn't add much stuff new, so...

yeah so basically your entire argument was based off of this assumption that his posts were not kinda just passively fine with what's going on, which you are wrong about.

Game 28: Guess Who?

good activity guys, I understand both of your arguments, I would just like to note that I lynched Wilma for most of yesterday, not Nathaniel. I don't think you missed this, I just think you're ignoring it for some reason. I gut read steveland as a townie who was just inactive initially now, this is the only change to my reads from yesterday. I'd like to see some responses from Mrs. Grimm and Mirror Serena

Game 28: Guess Who?

they are generally good but look at the first few on page 4

Game 28: Guess Who?

I apologize, I missed the post that said you would be leaving for a few days but I still feel as though your activity was decreased from before. I have three scumreads (wilma serena and you, maybe add aya later if continues with bad posts) because I am leaning toward scum on all of them. Clearly not all of them are scum but it's just showing the people who are most likely scum. I understand why this is confusing. I think you and wilma could be partners because neither of you pressure each other and are kinda just passively fine with whatever the other person does, which I find extremely scummy. I have explained my town reads but here:

Guy and Lulu have been making extremely informed posts with very good arguments against their scumreads in a very readable manner. For highlight posts check out Lulu's post condemning Wilma somewhere in the last day, you'll notice how well-thought out her argument is.

Steveland, Grimm, and Aya are all neutrals. Steveland and Grimm MUST increase their activity today but Aya was town but then her posts became progressively less informed and more just I'm spewing out bullshit to make it seem like I'm contributing. They are all probably town but aren't active enough / I'm not confident enough to say for sure.

Let's talk, people, we need to lynch scum today.

Game 28: Guess Who?

first of all woah there with the OMGUS Wilma lol. That being said I feel as though that post has a lot more reasoning than all of your other posts thus far and I commend you for that, which makes you slightly more town for me, but not a ton... I am pretty sure that guy is still town and just mislynched because he has been contributing fairly frequently and his contributions seem well thought out. However, Nathaniel suddnely stopped posting when the main conflict didn't involve him, probably to stay under the radar. All of my previous reasons for lynching him still apply, you can read almost every post I've made in this thread so far if you want to know about these in more detail. As for potential partners, I find Grimm, Serena, or Aya all possible just because of their lack of interactions with him (ignoring each other is a common tactic between two scumbuddies) Aya similarly decreased her activity yesterday when the main conflict didn't involve her, so I'm leaning more neutral on her rather than town.

lynch Nathaniel E.

Game 28: Guess Who?

Mirror Serena wrote:Molly you are saying I have no content so I guess you don't see what I'm doing as content and you expect me to have a full read list half way through day 2

Also plurality is on me I don't really appreciate that

I never said you needed a full read list. This is not content though:

"Sorry I've had a ton of school shit thrown at me this week

One thing i'd like to say about the post above, is that you ask this question to Guy as if inactivity is the only reason I would be lynched and is also a bad reason. However you lynched me after Guy lynched me. What was your reason?

If its that im inactive, then you are being a hypocrite in this post
If its that you are hopping on a bw, then dont do that
If its another reason, why are you assuming that Guy is lynching me for inactivity

I WILL TRY AND BE ACTIVE OK ;__:"

in this you
- point out that you are inactive
- say not to scumread you because of your inactivity (which is true!)
- say that you will try to be inactive

this is not content and this has been your only real post. That is all I'm poining out. Any kind of contribution would be good.

Game 28: Guess Who?

yeah wilma is still scum here but mirror serena is another possible partner, her most recent posts have no content despite her posting instead of just being inactive. In order of most to least likely scum it's Wilma/Nathaniel/Brianna/Serena. Then "neutral" reads are Steveland/Grimm (the former two because they are inactive) and town is Aya/Guy/Lulu (with Aya being closest to neutral). these are where my thoughts stand for right now, I can give you more in depth reasoning on my thoughts on each of these people but I don't feel like it right now and I've pretty much stated my thoughts on all of you already

Game 28: Guess Who?

why are you guys lynching the inactive person instead of the person without any content in their reads? Like remember yesterday when the person didn't respond and then they got lynched and they were town... I will lynch Mirror Serena if they, say, comment and they have no content in their reads, or if they do other scummy actions but currently I have no reason to lynch them. I don't like Aya's most recent post nor do I like ANY of Brianna's posts, so definitely more neutral on Aya and potential scum on Brianna but I think a Nathaniel + Wilma scumteam is most likely right now.