Search found 55 matches for Sanpei S.

Game 29: Guess Who?

This was, at least at the start, a really good game, especially 2-4.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Penelope C. wrote:Cool, the image didn't work.



How about now?

@Sanpei: Somewhat, yeah. It was partly because I did think I'd be lower on a revised scumread list, but I didn't consider that I was the only one to have mentioned you as a town leader. I also unlynched Anita because I basically freaked out and backtracked on reflex once I got the QuickTopic to work and saw that she was my partner. (...totally didn't freak out again when Carl made a wallpost about it. What are you talking about?)

Lol I didn't notice anything about Carl's wallpost hahaha. Idk why Anita did what she did but it was a shit play and I feel as though you, Penelope, were good enough scum that you could've easily won had you had a second partner past day one.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Penelope C. wrote:TWENTY

MINUTES



Well played though, Kylan!  I can't really complain about anything other than my own missing the deadline and qh opportunity.

I need to find out who Anita is so I can apologize to them, seeing as QuickTopic decided to not work for me initially and I had no clue that Anita was my partner at first.

Am I correct in assuming that this was a semi-slip by you, the "reasoning" behind my death? And also the true reason you killed me?

Game 29: Guess Who?

Nicely clutched at the end their, and GG to all.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Penelope was the obvious scum as soon as she announced that I died because of being Town Leader, even though she was far more active than I at the time.

Game 29: Guess Who?

The Rodman wrote:Not according to the app Timely

according to timestamps here and aj on ps it did *shrugs*

Game 29: Guess Who?

The Rodman wrote:Actually 10 seconds
So why not i tried lynch kylan

Nah you were late fam

Game 29: Guess Who?

Deadline

Game 29: Guess Who?

Oh, right...

BAH!


GO TOWN!
DONT LET ME DOWN!

















BAH!

Game 29: Guess Who?

Rhyanna F. wrote:the quality of rodman's posts were irrelevant to my townread on him. He lynched anita immediately on day 1, and Anita legitimately tried to go after him (switching to horatio/penelope when this failed). I doubt that they'd both be bussing that hard, which makes me very certain that rodman is town. Try to get past your own biases of him having low quality posts and the point should make sense.

What...?

You think that him getting a lucky lynch and then Anita OMGUSing him makes him townie..?


what

Game 29: Guess Who?

Rhyanna F. wrote:dont look at the number of times they've posted, look at interactions including and about them....
it's very clear why i think rodman's town, go look up if you're confused.

Their posts seemed way too minimalist for my liking...

Game 29: Guess Who?

deadline has already passed. HOW DOES RHYANNA SEE AN INACTIVE AS THE TOWNIEST PLAYER WHAT!? I don't think Rodman has posted like more than twice today...

Game 29: Guess Who?

>rodman
>most town

Game 29: Guess Who?

If he's town, well, I'm going to have to rebase like half my reads list...

Game 29: Guess Who?

I'm going to DIE laughing if PJ is actually scum, which I'm starting to think more and more given that he's not even trying to defend himself...

Game 29: Guess Who?

Carl G. wrote:

Sanpei S. wrote:
Carl G.(0)- Again, who?

^^^ someone apparently can't be arsed to read any of my content considering i have the same or more than some of the people you gave reads of. please go ahead and read my stuff and stop bullshitting.

apologies for not getting out my reads yesterday, was super busy and didnt end up getting on. just in the middle of making them up still, so i'd expect them out in a 2 or so hours probs when i get the chance to finish them all.

-snip-

I feel as if most of your activity was in the 2-3 days during Day 2 where I was away, and that post was done without any sort of looking through the posts. It wasn't a way to say that you didn't have any activity, it was more me saying that I personally couldn't recall off the top of my head anything significantly scummy or townie that you had said. My apologies if it came off the wrong way.

Ridiculous Carl G. wrote:alright here's my reads list:

Manning P. - i really really appreciated the manning activity during day 2 cause it helped me in terms of gaining an opinion on him. personally, i feel his analysis has been really on point. feel he tunnelled a little bit too hard on the ian lynch, but it was fairly valid and honestly not minding that considering he explained fairly well his pov, and that he didn't feel swayed elsewhere. right now, i'd say im leaning town after day 2. much clearer compared to day 1 and a big improvement.

I agree with most of what you said here, except for the last two sentences... I personally see Manning as a more Neutral-Town than Townie, but that could just be me. More explanation later.

Snazzy Carl G. wrote:The Rodman - new sub is quiet too, i think rodman's account is cursed and is never gonna have activity sadly :/ post more if you're here, considering you did log on on tuesday and did not post a thing.

Kind of tempted to unlynch PJ and lynch Rodman, as inactives will just weigh us down as we approach mylo/lylo. Especially given that he's logged in and hasn't posted.

Fat Carl G. wrote:Penelope C. - i have no fucking clue how to view penelope right now. i certainly don't view her as a town lead right now like sanpei, but she's not definite scum or anything to me right now. things i mentioned before in my big wallpost are still bothering me (refer back, im not bothering to bring it into here when it's easily found and far too much for a reads list), however im still in the mind of her analysis and arguments so far have been pretty great for discussion, and she's definitely contributing in some way towards the town goal, bringing up new things. neutral at the moment, most likely gonna swing today depending on how stuff goes.

How do you not see Penelope as a town lead, but mention me as one in the same post? If anything, Penelope was more of a leader yesterday than I was...I agree with the actual read on her, and most of everything else you said, and that she's neutral but swingy (leaning town rn for me, but still swingy), I'm just not a fan of the way you started with backing it up.

Crazy Carl G. wrote:Professor Jacuzzi - I'm probably in agreement with others at this stage on Jacuzzi. Most likely a slight scum lean right now, however I'm unsure considering day 1 and his point of view on Anita. From my POV, it would seem a bit early to go for a lynch on Anita, if he was joining the bandwagon to avoid suspicion (he did give good evidence and stuff so it wouldn't just seem like 'im joining cause everyone else is'), however, i don't get his bitching about L-1 when people can generally count and pay attention to their lynches, especially considering the person they were lynching and everyone's point of views on Anita at that stage. Personally though I don't feel like he's contributed hugely to town. His lynch on scum happened, yes, but literally not much else. He pointed out some things in reply to Kylan in regards about Horatio (which fair enough, I'm probably quite for a Horatio lynch today), but I don't know whether to put this as a lack of proactivity around stuff, or just him sliding through the game. Unsure on my view, slight scum lean to neutral i guess.

*smashes like button*

ajhockeyCarl G. wrote:Rhyanna F. - i don't have much to say about Rhyanna. i mean she's definitely got a pretty large amount of commentary about the game, but i generally don't like her posting style, however i get that she's still conveying information, sharing responses frequently and generally being good at provoking questions/discussion. lack of filler too which is surprising considering the post count lol. towny to me, doubt it's gonna shift unless something major happens.

What about her posting style do you dislike? And is it just a personal preference or is it bad enough to make you townread her less? (Just looking for clarification on thatm otherwise I agree with you)

Running-out-of-nicknames Carl G. wrote:Kylan R. - the stuff kylan had was ok, but it's limited. i can't really pull apart much of it, however much i want to. i feel his analysis that he had has been good, pretty towny and all, but the lack of content isn't helping me in terms of getting a read. i would say off the stuff i have that im leaning town, but only slightly.

I'd love to see more from Kylan, but I agree that he's at the very least been TRYING to analyze everything.

I hate Carl G. wrote:Sanpei S. - Pretty unchanged on sanpei. his stuff is fairly good, but im not liking a few of his point of views, and lack of detail to his reads as mentioned earlier. don't think he's scum right now however, but definitely in my sights in terms of a person i'd have in mind at some point. not sure what else I can bring forth that isn't said already, will probably have a look further later on. neutral to slight scum.

Clarified this above, am going to try to make some better stuff tomorrow.

Caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarl \"that kills people" G. wrote:Horatio A. - my most likely lynch today. lack of content right now, and his sparse posting from time to time isn't helping (although he did mention he'll fix it 2 days ago [then never rectified that further]). personally i feel the lynch would be fairly valuable versus some others today, but that's just me.

Not necessarily sure I would put Horatio over PJ and Rodman, but I definitely understand where Carl is coming from here.

The Rodman wrote:Uh ya sorry I have been really busy with school and sports getting home around 10pm everyday. Albeit, I do sort of agree with Rhyanna's reasoning of Prof. Jacuzzi I do not think repeating a method of preservation is really scummy because it is still preservation. If I had to guess scum rn it would be Sanpei because of what I see as evasiveness. While you could argue I'm pretty evasive as well, I think next week won't be too stressful for me.

How am I being evasive, beyond what I clarified at the very beginning of this post? That's not my intent, obviously, but I'm curious to see what you perceive as evasiveness.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Lynch Professor Jacuzzi

Because the only reason I can see scum not plurshifting off themselves is if the only other wagon is their partner.


This is a PRELIMINARY VOTE. I do not intend to keep this, unless I find new information to support it.

Game 29: Guess Who?

I'd like to see everyone post a similar sort of wall, honestly

Game 29: Guess Who?

Horatio A.(1)- Manning P.: Horatio has moved up on my scum list, due to the goings-on of the end of last day

Sanpei S.(0)- 100% top scumread lynch sanpei

Penelope C.(0)- Fairly townie, shelling out great activity, very responsive, putting stuff out there a lot and is probably our town leader here

Professor Jacuzzi(0)- Quite honestly my highest scumread because of Anita now... I don't love that WIFOM, but if Anita was bad enough to claim scum maybe she was bad enough to out her partner with it as well.

The Rodman(0)- Rodman still feels way too AFK, fly-under-the-radar for me to properly townread him, but he's definitely sitting neutral still, with a potential scum lean.

Kylan R.(0) - Who?

Rhyanna F.(0) - Same position as Penelope, but she's said something things that bothered me (will quote if requested) but she's town read leaning towards neutral atm.

Carl G.(0)- Again, who?

Manning P.(0)- Dislike the one-off lynch on Horatio and disappear, but I understand it. I'd LOVE to think that you're town too, but I'm very hestitant to TR a lynch and leave.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Going along with it =/= being scummy, because honestly, how else do you answer the trolly question (assuming that's what you were talking about).

I apologize for not staying on Anita on Day 1, the sudden build up of lynches on her terrified me because I thought "woah if this many people susp her there may be scum in that mix"

Game 29: Guess Who?

Horatio A. wrote:@Penelope and Sanpai I see what you mean about you can’t really lynch someone for joking around but (also Penelope, it isn’t the only reasoning/basis I scumread him) so what I meant for the joking around as one of the reasons I was lynching Sanpai is that going along with it seems sorta scummy, no? Could’ve questioned it/called Anita out for joking around and not contributing instead of just going along with it and reply in a trolly matter.

I'll try and be more active from now on.

Did you not notice that I was like the first person to susp her for it?

Game 29: Guess Who?

D a y t i m e boys.

I have to apologize for my antics at the end of yesterday. I really, really wanted to be more active, but mother was yelling at me to get off the phone while we were out at dinner.

I promise to be significantly more forthcoming with reads/etc. as we go into today, starting with a reads list, hopefully at some point tomorrow morning (for my time zone)

Game 29: Guess Who?

Rhyanna F. wrote:also what specifically makes you scumread horatio? his lynch reasoning on you seemed fine to me, not sure what you disliked about it.

He just seemed so ambivalent until that post, and since he'd never said much in my direction before it rubbed me in such a bad way (maybe just because it was on me? but idk I could be way off)

Game 29: Guess Who?

It's 2 on Ian 2 on me 1 on horatio...before my lynch. Lynching Horatio would have left plur on me...

Game 29: Guess Who?

Sorry - I'm out to dinner and may not have time to post again, so I'm kind of desperate.

Lynch Ian S.

Because while I more scumread Horatio, Ian is getting up there, and I would really rather not die.