Search found 17 matches for Professor Jacuzzi

Game 31: Separated Scum

fuck ed tbh

Game 29: Guess Who?

OMG KYLAN I LOVE YOU

Game 29: Guess Who?

This is PSAnon, the players here are all at least reasonably experienced. I'd be extremely surprised if someone was actually bad enough to claim scum and their partner. That's just throwing the game away d1.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Ian S. wrote:Never expected Anita to flip scum, tbh. Reads and thoughts coming tonight, after I take a nap.

Idk what happened here, but Ian never gave any reads like he said he would, and this has been his only post today, which makes me think he's trying to lurk and avoid suspicion. He didn't explain why he didn't expect Anita to flip scum either which is interesting. Manning made a good pot about Ian a bit back which I agree with as well. I'll read a bit more into his posts later but if he doesn't post anything more before the dl then I'll probably end up shifting on to him.

Game 29: Guess Who?

@Kylan

Alright so you made a good point about Horatio. I thought I did actually post something about him a bit back, idk what happened there. Maybe I'm just losing my mind. Anyway I guess I'll make a post about him now.

Honestly there's not a lot to look at imo. He's made three posts overall, one was pregame and another was right at the beginning of RVS. The only thing of note was his wall post on Anita. I don't think I ever really explained why I found it scummy so here goes.

Horatio A. wrote:(I'm probably late here, but oh well still must say)

Manning P. wrote:lynch the rodman

third is always scum get him

Firstly, usin' "third is always scum" isn't really a good reason to RVS, since it's now easily seen through as nothing really that important and is sorta the same as a lynch without reasoning tbh.

Idk if anyone else noticed this, but Horatio's comment here is actually really unusual. Of course "third is always scum" is the same as a lynch without reasoning. The point of the lynch was just to get the game going. "A good reason to RVS" doesn't even make sense: you don't need a reason to random lynch, that's why it's random?

Horatio A. wrote:
Secondly, I don't really like Anita's reactions to lynches especially with most of them being filler/unhelpful contributions such as:

Anita B. wrote:

Sanpei S. wrote:You don't just ask us our thoughts on you lynching people.

You lynch them, and then see what we think. God.

Unlynch Professor Jacuzzi, Lynch Anita B.


Asking us to "approve" your lynch seems like a scummy thing to do, no? It's as though you're mafia asking town what to do so you can try to fit in better.

Can confirm I'm Mafia with professor jacuzzi

Lynch Penelope C

^ clear trolling/filler that contributes nothing at all.

This is near identical to what I said in my post directly above.

Professor Jacuzzi wrote:
Someone brings up some valid concerns about you... and you just react by claiming scum. That's just trolly and unhelpful.

Ironic how they call someone out for filler when they're doing the same thing.

Horatio A. wrote:

Anita B. wrote:

Rhyanna F. wrote:

Carl G. wrote:Not really sure why we're spreading lynches just for the sake of it. No clue why exactly this has any use when we all know this is just usual day 1 meta. Anyway, how about you all explain your lynches when you carry them out for a change? It's always nice for that to happen.

My reasoning is that Anita is clearly mafia

Anita B. wrote:Hello folks! Now that we've started, I figure we can just do this properly, after the usual d1 Bs ofc.

So I'd like to see what everyone's thoughts on me lynching Horatio A or Penelope C?

Both of those lynches are fine, but I think lynching Anita B. is a better lynch over those two.

Same

'Same' is once again an un-usefulness contribution.

Also similar to what I said above, can't be bothered quoting it this time though.

Horatio A. wrote:
Thirdly, I don't get why Anita is asking people to come back so oftenly?

Anita B. wrote:Because honestly, you seem really flippant between me / penelope c / The rodman

speaking of rodman

YO RODMAN could you please explain your actions, thanks!

^ asking to explain one action

What's wrong with asking someone to explain one action?

Horatio A. wrote:

Anita B. wrote:

Ian S. wrote:Now that I have seen the monstrosity that is my picture, time to post reads, and oh so many interesting things I have seen.

Dude your picture is amazing.

Also Professor Jacuzzi can you come back pls

^ Wanting someone to come back who has only been gone for ~10 hours or so?

ahem

Professor Jacuzzi wrote:
I've been gone for like 12 hours, you know sleep exists right?

Also, for whoever said I called someone out for just repeating what other people said when I did the same myself (can't remember who it was): at the time of my lynch on Anita, there were only two other people on the bandwagon, Rhyanna and Rodman. Rhyanna's lynch was a random one from RVS. Rodman posted literally one line about how he believed Anita's scum claim. I actually went through and analysed Anita's posts and explained why I thought they were scummy. I don't see how you can say that was just me bringing up old stuff, but please, do enlighten me.

Game 29: Guess Who?

My bad, could've sworn I saw a post from Rodman late yesterday.

Unlynch The Rodman

Game 29: Guess Who?

Carl/Sanpei/Penelope/Rhyanna/Manning all look like town to me. They've all been pretty active and pushed some good ideas. I'd like a lynch on Horatio/Rodman today. Neither of them have said much, Rodman in particular hasn't contributed at all and I made a post about Horatio a bit back.

To me, Kylan looks like he needs a sub, so I'm gonna hold off on giving any reads there for now. Dunno about Ian, will look into his posts a bit further when I have more time.

lynch the rodman

Game 29: Guess Who?

Sorry, I've had a pretty busy past couple of days and haven't really had the chance to post here.

It's pretty common etiquette to announce when you're putting someone at L-1. I wasn't trying to say it was a bad idea to hammer Anita, rather that hammering someone so early in the day wastes valuable discussion time.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Rhyanna F. wrote:if anita is mafia i think her partner is professor jacuzi
i will explain if it is relevant but i dont think its needed otherwise

Care to explain why? It's a little strange to just go ahead and post who you think the scumpartners are without giving any reasons.

Game 29: Guess Who?

(That's Anita at L-1, could we please announce it when we're putting someone at L-1 in the future?)

Anyway, I also find Penelope's bandwagoning fairly scummy. I've read through her post, but to me it just looks like she regurgitated reasons others had already brought up.

Would like to hear some reads from Kylan so far. He's said two things all game and both have been irrelevant.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Okay Anita has been acting really weird today to be honest and I wouldn't mind a lynch on them. Looking through their posts I see a lot of filler and not actually a lot of scumhunting.

Anita B. wrote:Hello folks! Now that we've started, I figure we can just do this properly, after the usual d1 Bs ofc.

So I'd like to see what everyone's thoughts on me lynching Horatio A or Penelope C?

I know others have already pointed this out, but this is just really strange. Asking for thoughts on whether to lynch someone or not is just filler when you can go ahead and do it and see how people react. Particularly when it was still early on in the day and no one had any actual reads.

Anita B. wrote:

Sanpei S. wrote:You don't just ask us our thoughts on you lynching people.

You lynch them, and then see what we think. God.

Unlynch Professor Jacuzzi, Lynch Anita B.


Asking us to "approve" your lynch seems like a scummy thing to do, no? It's as though you're mafia asking town what to do so you can try to fit in better.

Can confirm I'm Mafia with professor jacuzzi

Lynch Penelope C

Someone brings up some valid concerns about you... and you just react by claiming scum. That's just trolly and unhelpful.

Anita B. wrote:

Rhyanna F. wrote:

Carl G. wrote:Not really sure why we're spreading lynches just for the sake of it. No clue why exactly this has any use when we all know this is just usual day 1 meta. Anyway, how about you all explain your lynches when you carry them out for a change? It's always nice for that to happen.

My reasoning is that Anita is clearly mafia

Anita B. wrote:Hello folks! Now that we've started, I figure we can just do this properly, after the usual d1 Bs ofc.

So I'd like to see what everyone's thoughts on me lynching Horatio A or Penelope C?

Both of those lynches are fine, but I think lynching Anita B. is a better lynch over those two.

Same

Completely filler and all it did was add to their postcount.

Anita B. wrote:Cool, gn everyone!

More filler.

Anita B. wrote:

Ian S. wrote:Now that I have seen the monstrosity that is my picture, time to post reads, and oh so many interesting things I have seen.

Dude your picture is amazing.

Also Professor Jacuzzi can you come back pls

And just as they were starting to develop actual scumreads and make serious posts, they go and say this.

I know that Anita has been one of the most active posters so far, but if you discount the filler and poor reasoning, they actually haven't said that much. To me, they look like they're just trying to seem active.

Lynch Anita B.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Anita B. wrote:

Ian S. wrote:Now that I have seen the monstrosity that is my picture, time to post reads, and oh so many interesting things I have seen.

Dude your picture is amazing.

Also Professor Jacuzzi can you come back pls

I've been gone for like 12 hours, you know sleep exists right?

My lynch on Ian was more of a random lynch than anything. I didn't expect people to call me out for shaky reasoning, because I personally didn't consider it a serious lynch. Anyway, now that we're (mostly) out of RVS...

Unlynch Ian S.

I'll post some reads later today.

Game 29: Guess Who?

Penelope C. wrote:

Carl G. wrote:Not really sure why we're spreading lynches just for the sake of it. No clue why exactly this has any use when we all know this is just usual day 1 meta. Anyway, how about you all explain your lynches when you carry them out for a change? It's always nice for that to happen.

That's just it-usual day 1 meta. That doesn't make it inherently bad. That being said...

Lynch Professor Jacuzzi, because using "Speak up, please" as a reason for a lynch when you're the fourth game-related post seems weird.

Are you really lynching me because one of my posts seemed "weird"? That's seriously vague, elaborate please.

Anita B. wrote:
Can confirm I'm Mafia with professor jacuzzi

It's a good thing you're cute....

Game 29: Guess Who?

Carl G. wrote:Not really sure why we're spreading lynches just for the sake of it. No clue why exactly this has any use when we all know this is just usual day 1 meta. Anyway, how about you all explain your lynches when you carry them out for a change? It's always nice for that to happen.

Ever heard of a random vote?

Game 29: Guess Who?

alright, leggo

Lynch Ian S.

speak up please

Game 29: Guess Who?

Professor Jacuzzi wrote:confirming

I have the cutest avatar btw.

I take that back.

Game 29: Guess Who?

confirming

I have the cutest avatar btw.