Search found 31 matches for Natasha L.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

RIP MISSED CALL ;3;3;3;;3;33;;3;

RABBAC PLAYED WELL?

Why did we lynch Towa again? Zeonth you played great :I

I actually think the best player in this game was ssr as mimi but he got fucked when Ramona targetted him twice

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Ramona G. wrote:

Natasha L. wrote:Lol, tfw you get more points than the MVP  because you turbo Charmaine

Gg

I was 1 minute late for the Mimi lynch ;___________________________________;

FeelsBadMan

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Lol, tfw you get more points than the MVP because you turbo Charmaine

Gg

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

I'm away and will not be able to post much today. Also I think Charmaine is scum and because I'm away I don't really care about the points, I just want this to end. lynch Charmaine

I'll check on the game but activity will be limited because away. This may or may not give away who I am, whatever.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Charmaine U. wrote:still waiting for nan to actually post some thoughts on people since she has been avoiding it all game

I mean you haven't really done much yourself recently, just been really negative and telling other people to contribute passively. lol.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

keeping my promise from yesterday. Lynch Mimi F.

I hope she's not town... that defense wasn't very good lmao so probably scum

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

if mimi doesn't make a statement by tomorrow afternoon, I will lynch her or Charmaine

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Charmaine U. wrote:

Ramona G. wrote:

Charmaine U. wrote:

Natasha L. wrote:Ramona, I seriously doubt that mafia idled every night you targetted Mimi, Ramona.

idled? thats the least likely thing, here are more likely options

1) mimi is mafia and sent the kill
2) mafia tried to kill mimi but jailkeeper saved her
3) mafia tried to kill mimi but doc saved her

annie can help us out with 3 but im just saying theres 1% chance that mafia idled

1) That is arguably the most likely option since...

2) I just cannot see why mafia would choose to kill Mimi over Annie. If they killed Mimi, not only they confirm a ton of useful information that Mimi posted as legitimate but also they eased the scumhunting on lylo.

3) Annie the doc already said that she protected me.

mafia could try to kill the most town player out of the villies since killing you or annie is a 50/50 though idk

waiting for nan or mimi to post something

Charmaine is also really buddying with Mimi here. "Maybe the mafia tried to kill someone instead of Annie because..." Charmaine x Mimi scumteam? It would make sense at this point.

Also I think there's some sort of misunderstanding here with the probability that Mimi is scum. Here, I'll explain what happened to Charmaine and Ramona:

Ramona revealed her targets, saying that she targetted Mimi a lot of the nights that there were no kills. She thought that the mafia might have idled those nights, but realized also that it was extremely unlikely that the Mafia would idle on specifically those nights, especially Night 2. Charmaine, for some reason, thought Ramona was saying that the Mafia likely idled, and pointed out that it didn't. Hopefully this should settle the confusion.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Charmaine U. wrote:

Natasha L. wrote:Ramona, I seriously doubt that mafia idled every night you targetted Mimi, Ramona.

idled? thats the least likely thing, here are more likely options

1) mimi is mafia and sent the kill
2) mafia tried to kill mimi but jailkeeper saved her
3) mafia tried to kill mimi but doc saved her

annie can help us out with 3 but im just saying theres 1% chance that mafia idled

yes, it's the least likely thing, which is why I doubted it.

Ramona was suggesting it. Talk to her.

Can you like make sense lol ?_?

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Ramona, I seriously doubt that mafia idled every night you targetted Mimi, Ramona.

I mean, I've townread Mimi ever since my first read post on day 2(?) so I'm kind of surprised by this...

Mimi, please post your thoughts. Unlynch Charmaine for now, I'd like to here Mimi post more thoughts on the jailkeeper targets

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

[quote=Natasha L.]Charmaine looks like scum to me, however. She did not even talk about how her huge scum read, whom she'd been turboing the entire game, flipped town. Ever since, she's posted random scum teams and not really contributed throughout the entire game. That lynch was idiotic.

Lynch Charmaine[/quote]

Oh, it wasn't clear enough? I'm sorry, my justified lynch on you was explained in this post and the post before that.

Lynch Charmaine I trust you Ramona... I guess lynching might be better.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

same

Annie and Ramona I need your opinions on whether or not to NL Now. Like, literally now.

And Charmaine, defend yourself.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Nanette B. wrote:

natasha wrote:However, now her inactive sub hasn't really said anything, so I'm not sure what to say about her.

what? the game went on for like half a real day before night. And Ive had one person respond to me. I dont know what you want from me. I have nothing to provide, seeing as Im subbing in for someone inactive. If you want info, ask JK/doc who theyve used their actions on. that may give us some insight.

I'm sorry, I thought you subbed in earlier for some reason. At least give some reads, please.


I'm having horrible trouble with pop-up ads on the forum site. They are terrible, won't go away, and force me to restart my computer almost every time they happen ;; I may not be on as much as a result, but I'll try to post as much as I can.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

From my POV atm, we have a 2/3 chance to lynch scum. Great job some combonation of Ramona and Annie!

But is NLing better? If we lynch a townie and then don't get the correct protect, then we lose. You post your opinions.

Charmaine in my opinion is most likely scum, obviously with either Mimi or Nanette. I was not really defending Nanette earlier, I just said her being inactive is not a reason to lynch her. However, now her inactive sub hasn't really said anything, so I'm not sure what to say about her. Mimi has provided valuable insight all game, so I feel as though Nanette is more likely the scumteam with Charmaine than Mimi.

I think NLing is our best play here though. Doctor and Jailkeeper, as you are confirmed town, you guys choose.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Would like to point out that I'm fine with an Icarus lynch too, just one of them please

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

I'm salty, very. Why the hell would you lynch someone who lead a lynch on a scum member when bussing in this theme is just a bad idea? What the fuck guys? I thought you were better than this. With that, my biggest town read is gone.

I'm not sure if nanette is scum. Just because she's been inactive, doesn't mean she's scum.

Charmaine looks like scum to me, however. She did not even talk about how her huge scum read, whom she'd been turboing the entire game, flipped town. Ever since, she's posted random scum teams and not really contributed throughout the entire game. That lynch was idiotic.

Lynch Charmaine

As for potential partners, Professor Icarus stands out. They haven't been buddying, but they haven't really been against each other- Professor Icarus did one of his signature "This person may be scum or town reads" on her.

I'm not copying Mimi or Annie, actually, I didn't read this page when I formulated my scumreads because I starting writing this when I was fuming about us lynching my biggest town read.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Charmaine, are you fucking serious? GOD. You didn't even comment on the Gurkinn flip! Your reads were one sentence? Thoughts? More like randlynch Nanette.

LYNCH CHARMAINE

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

assuming no ccs at this point.

As with Towa, I'm extremely surprised. I commend Ramona and Annie for playing scummy enough to not die for being too townie, but not the other way around. These were both on my leaning-scum list, but good job guys.

OK, that means 5 left from my POV. I am a VT.

Towa Q. - I'm staying with my read that s/he is town from the previous page. (check it out). I feel as though in a theme where it is 3v10, scum bussing each other does not sound like the best idea. She helped me start the Fernando lynch. I don't see any reason that she would be scum.

Professor Icarus - Almost all of the alive people who haven't claimed doc/jk were on my Leaning-Town list, so I have to turn reads on someone. With his recent reads, a lot of them were "here's one reason why this person may be scum, but here's another reason that means that they could be town." See his read on Ramona;

"although Ramona has been lacking, personally I could see her as a possible townie, but just one that isn't willing to put forth tons of information. It's possible to see it as scummy yes"

or worse, his read on me:

"unsure about Natasha really. I feel she is possible scum like some of us were saying, but at the same time I can see some areas outright where they seem overall towny like in several posts. Right now neutral, but this will probably change over today I'm sure. "

As a result, I'm fine with a lynch on him. I won't lynch him until I see Charmaine's thoughts on the Gurkinn flip, though.

Charmaine - I commented on her in my previous post, but ever since the Gurkinn lynch, to whom she had been turboing since Day 2, she has not posted any of her thoughts. ANY. This was her turbo, and yet she has still not posted any thoughts about the fact that her read flipped town! I was surprised too, but seriously Charmaine. Scum? Maybe. I don't know yet. I'd like to see her opinion on the Gurkinn flip.

Nanette - I would like a sub for her; she said that she can't get on specifically because she was having computer troubles. I do not have enough info about her to make a read, which at this point in the game, is troubling.

Mimi - I mean, her ideas are great, and she's been really helpful for town. There's not much else to say besides the fact that she is likely town.

I agree with Mimi, JK and Doc claim actions for nights 1 and 3, but not night 2.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

IF ANYONE CCS EITHER OF THESE CLAIMS, CC NOW PLEASE

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

then* at the end of my last post. sorry, I'm a grammar nazi.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Ramona G. wrote:Okay, let me try to analyze what happen. The scum chose a very interesting kill in Haruno, which was a rather inactive player and also wasn't really "town" to most people. In contrast, the scum chose to killed Delilah during Night 1 which was very active and a town read to most. This is probably what happened, the scum must have chosen someone townie to kill N2 but wasn't successful so they change plans. I don't know how useful this is tbh (I just want to type it out) but when we do discuss what happened during Night 2, it may be useful. Also, it is interesting why they went with Haruno, and not some other players. After all they are arguably better targets than her and there are only max of 2 protections in the game.

Why is this relevant? Please explain to me why this is relevant, because otherwise this seems like a top notch filler to me.

That being said, I am in support for a JK and Doc claim. I could not explain this any more than Towa already did.

Now, for a thing I am surprised no one commented on.
Holy shit, Gurkinn flipped town. Really??? OK, this doesn't mean much, but seriously, what the fuck, I think we need to make better read posts because god, that was bad. I still support my read on him as he flipped town, he just wasn't being great under pressure.

...That being said, what does this flip mean for the game?
-JK and Doc should claim for reasons stated in Towa's post (one mislynch until LYLO)
-Charmaine suddenly becomes an interesting character; not obviously scum but if Gurkinn flipped scum, she was pseudo-confirmed. Now, I would like to watch her plays. I'm not stating exactly what I'm watching out for because then she would be careful not to do it, but it's important that we watch her after a turbo on a town player. (I'm not saying she is scum, I'm saying that combined with certain other things that she hasn't done yet (say, blindless turbo another player ) than she might be.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

I just realized I forgot to lynch Gurkinn in my readlist post. Sorry, meant to do that.

Lynch Gurkinn N.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Sorry for lack of activity yesterday in game. I was super busy and away.

Anyway, Gurkinn N.'s readlist is literally just defining what a town and scum read is. He obviously did not look over their posts; his read list is not enough contribution for me to warrant him being town.

As for claiming JK today, I would not do it. There's only a small chance that the person targetted by the JK was scum and RB was the thing that mattered.

I do not like the Brodie lynch, but I still townread Towa; s/he has been extremely helpful to town by leading lynches (even if they were wrong), along with that giant read post which analyzed each player's playstyle near the beginning of the game.

Time to do reads; These reads are categorized by what I think the person is and they are in order of towniest to scummiest, including in the categories themselves.

Town: Towa Q. - Despite my random lynch on her Day 1, I now believe that Towa is almost definitely town. I would like to remind everyone that it was ME who lead the lynch on Fernando, but Towa made that read post which, for me, changed the game around. Lynching her in the first place was blind of me. The one problem I had with her was the lynch on Brodie which I didn't really understand, but I was away and couldn't stop it. Overall, still town.

Neutral-Leaning-Town: Mimi F. - Helped me out with the Fernando lynch and in general, makes great points and I don't really have any reasons to scum read her. Sorry that this isn't much.
Professor Icarus - Composes really nice read posts that make great insights that are in my opinion, mostly correct. Even for his scum read on me, I realize why he is doing it and it is justified. Even though before this huge read post, I was not impressed by his activity, this post makes me town-read him a little.
Charmaine U. - This read will be hugely swung by a Gurkinn flip, if there is one. Obviously, she is turboing him, and so if Gurkinn flips scum, Charmaine goes from neutral-ish to basically confirmed town. If Gurkinn flips town, Charmaine will be going a little closer to scum, but still not relevant. I do not have a huge read.

Neutral: Annie F. - I'm frankly confused about her playstyle. I love her read list,but she manages to scumread Charmaine, while also scumreading Gurkinn. That just doesn't make sense. Is this a scum member just trying to get scumreads off on people who both sides of an argument could find the other scummy? Or is she just a town member making in general good, but some weird reads? I don't know.

Neutral-Leaning-Scum: Nanette B. - Hasn't posted lately, but her VT/JK thing really didn't say much about the game. Hasn't contributed at all, but unlike Ramona, Nanette has attempted to contribute, but ended up just stating the obvious. It's clear that Ramona is away, but Nanette seems scummy to me. Also, her posts have just been quoting people and passively agreeing with them. To me, this is very scummy.

Scum: Gurkinn N. - I explained my read on him earlier. His read post was less-than-helpful, and he really has just been fillering or pointing out obvious information for the entire game.

Too-Little-Activity-To-Read: Haruno H., Ramona G. (Both self-explanatory) Please pick up your activity guys.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Towa Q. wrote:Since Natasha seems to think I am stupid (point a), let me explain it a bit better. I know what a JK does. I'm not suggesting they both claim and try to protect each other.

What I am suggesting with this "vt claim" thing is this: We pick a target to start a lynch, hence the attempt on Professor Icarus/Gurkinn N. Then, we ask them if they are a VT. Here's what it does: If they are not a VT, and are in fact a town power role, then they can claim. I'm not asking for the outright claim of both of our power roles, as that just leads to suicide, but, if we're attempting to lynch either of our power roles, then it's better for them to claim and not waste our time continuing to put lynches/pressure on a target only for the PR claim a few votes short of hammer and then everyone unlynching and us having to restart a day before DL. At best, we would have only VT claims as we start hunting targets, although there is an advantage to getting one of our PR claims out. Instead of getting all the specific quotes about it, I will just put everything right here. I would like EITHER the JK OR the doc picked out by this method. I agree that them claiming right away without reason is not the best idea, but if we're about to lynch on of them, then we need to know it. Getting one of them to claim gives us a clear D1, or mafia can be stupid and try to claim a town PR on D1, and by asking them to specify which one, we have the ability to get a CC out and lynch between the two. We can also get a town leader that we know we can trust, not follow blindly if they have bad ideas, but that we can trust. If it is the JK that claims, then the doc can be on them right away. If it is the doc that claims, then the JK can be on them to protect them. This is what I meant by the doc can be on JK and the JK can be on doc. We have a 1/13 chance of attempting to lynch the doc, and a 2/13 chance to hit either of our power roles.

OK, this is explained much better. I still do not feel as though you explained it well the first time, and I do not understand why you have a scumread on me (you never explained it). All you said was "scum read - I need to re-look over her posts." That being said, I was looking for information and contributions from you, and you delivered.

Unlynch Towa Q.

I do, however, agree that Fernando T. is the scummiest person in the game right now (with you being dismissed). He's been fillering, jumping on every bandwagon, and all of his "contributing" has actually been explaining why he bandwagonned on the rl early day 1.

lynch Fernando T.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

Also I agree with Annie on the "putting very long explainers next to a simple point does not make us trust you" point.