Search found 45 matches for Leeku O.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Austin M. wrote:
Yosaku D. wrote:fine, i'm FrontieReddo161

Oh i remember him...Kappa

Very bad player. Never amounted to anything.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

AJ please tell these people that I am the one and only drookez.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Yosaku D. wrote:
Leeku O. wrote:
Yosaku D. wrote:Not even joking, nearly every game with a town win has a core of 2-3 active townies. This game had leeku and case(kinda), but umberto and I just drowned them out and that screwed you all.
(Note: 2-3 active townies does not guarantee a town win, it just makes it a lot easier)

Well it had austin but he didnt have a chance, and the problem was that even if one of us had suspected umberto/yosaku there wouldnt have been much backup from anyone because of the inactivity.

Yeah this is true which is why i said the game needed a core of active townies (austin was decently active, but we killed him more for what he posted than how he posted).

Leeku O. wrote:Also Yosaku, I need to know who you are because you played a perfect game imo.

I'm Drookez

No I'm Drookez.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Also Yosaku, I need to know who you are because you played a perfect game imo.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Yosaku D. wrote:Not even joking, nearly every game with a town win has a core of 2-3 active townies. This game had leeku and case(kinda), but umberto and I just drowned them out and that screwed you all.
(Note: 2-3 active townies does not guarantee a town win, it just makes it a lot easier)

Well it had austin but he didnt have a chance, and the problem was that even if one of us had suspected umberto/yosaku there wouldnt have been much backup from anyone because of the inactivity.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

ajhockeystar wrote:
Yosaku D. wrote:skype calls are fun! even though nobody talks in them!

pls. There are 4 categories of people:

1) The people who are completely dead and don't say anything. i.e. Celly Berry, Wonto

2) The people who only talk when prompted. i.e. Pash, Alpha

3) The people who talk a lot. i.e. Hannah, rssp

4) The person who talks the absolute most every time. He just won't ever shut up. He always has to drive the conversation. Sheesh, can we ever have some peace? i.e. AJ

~~You forgot the pedophile who pretends the 40 year old man talking was their friend pranking them~~

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

;-;

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Ramone R. wrote:Lynch Leeku btw
I'll be back in a bit to look over the rest.

IF I DO GET LYNCHED REMEMBER THAT LEEKU IS EVIL AND HE'S GONNA BE LIKE "I told you he wasn't scum" DON'T BELIEVE HIS LIES.

(if you're actually town then I'm sorry Leeku BUT I KNOW YOU'RE NOT)

-Ramone R.

As I said before I don't care if you're scum or not, if you're not willing to help town, you're scum to me, and I wouldnt oppose a lynch on you. I see you to be better than mariss and foreman which is why at this point i'm not for a lynch on you.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

So basically, if I had to lynch an 'active' player right now, it would be milton, if I had to lynch between Mariss, Ramone, and The Foreman, probably Foreman unless he's subbed out in which case Mariss.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

First of all let me just ask everyone: Do you really believe I would endanger myself by going this hard on Luana if I was mafia. Even I have to admit I was tunnelling but it would be a pretty stupid thing to do if I was mafia.

Ramone R: I don't know. Everyone seems adamant to lynch him but I believe he's town. I'm against this partisular lynch since I find your posts not so scummy and I don't see the filler in them. I've asked for people to point it out but they haven't yet. Leaning Town.

The Foreman: 0. Nothing. Not necessarily scum but not gonna help us anyway. Approve a lynch on him. Neutral.

Uncle Milton: I think he was the first to suggest the 'if it isn't Luana, then it's definitely Leeku' which, to be honest is just an easy way for scum to get rid of 2 townies without suspicion. Scum.

Pierre: Keeps it short and sweet and to the point. One of the better players in this imo. Town for now.

Case C.: See the problem with case is, he hasn't said anything that hasn't already been said by someone else. However his posts still seem mostly towny. Leaning Town.

Umberto : One of the 2 most active players. The problem is I really don't see the inactives being all scummy, so there's probably a 'town leader' that's gonna flip scum. Town for now tho.

Mariss : Not much to say again, your lack of posts is not really helping your cause.

Yosaku: Town. Definitely Town. I seriously don't see Yosaku flipping scum. It's either that or he's really good.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Yosaku D. wrote:Leeku, why is Case so scummy in your list? Any reasoning behind that read?

I talked a bit about it in my first read list but i'll be making a new one in ~12 hours. Just coming on now to check for new posts now and I don't have the time to make it.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Mariss, Foreman, Case, Ramone, Milton, Pierre, Yosaku, Umberto for me. (Scummy-->Towny)

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

This might be contradicting my earlier posts but can you guys tell me why you're going for Ramone? It's weird but I'm getting this towny vibe from him and his posts aren't that bad. Can you point to a post where you felt he said something particularly scummy?

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Mariss A. wrote:Why are lynching based on activity, people have reasoning on not being able to be active, and why would that make them scummy if anything mafia would likely be active to avoid suspicion.
So far both lynches have been on town roles,
Pierre T., Umberto I., Leeku O. were on the day 1 lynch.
Leeku O., Case C., Uncle Milton, Umberto I., Clarissa W., Yosaku D. were on the day 2 lynch. The only names coming up twice are Umberto and Leeku. Umberto seems to be more of the town leader as how hes been the most active and he seems to be doing a lot of the work. Leeku has been different he wanted the Luana lynch since day 1 do to activity which is kinda a bad way to lynch. However we cant put out other people who bandwagon on the town lynches such as Clarissa and Yosaku day 2 and Umberto and Leeku day 1 who jumped off of their targets to Woodward which took plur off of Leeku.
So imo Lynch Leeku

See that's the problem. You haven't posted anything in a week and you come on and say lynching based on inactivity is bad and then lynch someone (me). The thing is even if you and the foreman were town I wouldn't want to get to lylo with someone who'll come on only once a week to post and not have a clear discussion. So since we still can afford a mislynch I'd rather we do it on someone we haven't seen anything useful from.
Lynch The Foreman

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Yosaku D. wrote:That's not good : /
Surprised that we were all wrong on the Luana lynch, I guess she was just really dead-set on not contributing much.
The flip makes Leeku look worse, but i'm not sure if scum would want to tunnel a townie that hard.
If neither Marissa/Foreman post anything contentful by the end of the day & they aren't subbed, i'm lynching one of them and I encourage you all to do the same since there's almost zero way one or both of them isnt scum if this occurs.
For now, Lynching Ramone R. until he brings up useful information / end-of-day conditions I already specified.

Well that flip would have made me look scummy anyway since 2-3 people were suspecting I was bussing. Losing an inactive/willingly not helping townie isn't such a bad thing anyway. Really feeling the Foreman lynch but I'll wait to see who's the least helpful between Marissa, The Foreman and Ramone.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

This should also be mentioned:

Members connected during last 24 hours : ajhockeystar, Austin M., Case C., Charmaine U., Haruno H., Leeku O., Mimi F., Pierre T., Professor Icarus, Ramona G., Ramone R., The Foreman, Towa Q., Umberto I., Uncle Milton, Woodward K., Yosaku D.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Umberto I. wrote:
Leeku O. wrote:I don't find Ramone to be particularly scummier than say Marissa or The Foreman. I think he's just a townie that's basically bored and half gamethrowing. I'm sticking to my lynch.

What are your thoughts on Luana?

3 posts all game, 0 useful content in any of them, 2 of them jumping on a wagon lynching me. Are there any thoughts that I should have other than 'scum'?

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

I don't find Ramone to be particularly scummier than say Marissa or The Foreman. I think he's just a townie that's basically bored and half gamethrowing. I'm sticking to my lynch.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

I don't really feel like that's a scumslip, more of a typo, but it is weird how Uncle Milton is completely avoiding it.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Clarissa W. wrote:
Leeku O. wrote:
Clarissa W. wrote:
Leeku O. wrote:
Case C. wrote:We should consolidate on a lynch soon rather than idle till deadline. I would suggest Pierre because unlike Marissa and The Foreman he's put out stuff that actually pings my scumdar.

I would suggest Luana for scumminess and inactivity

ajhockeystar wrote:Votecount 1.5
******************************
Woodward K.(3)- Pierre T., Umberto I., Leeku O.
Leeku O.(2)- Woodward K., Luana V.
Luana V.(1)- Austin M.
Pierre T.(1)- Case C.
Uncle Milton(1)- Yosaku D.
The Foreman(0)-
Umberto I.(0)-
Yosaku D.(0)-
Case C.(0)-
Austin M.(0)-
Ramone R.(0)-
Mariss A.(0)-
Clarissa W.(0)-
Not Voting(5)- The Foreman, Ramone R., Mariss A., Uncle Milton, Clarissa W.
******************************
There are 13 alive so it takes 7 to hammer. Plurality applies.
Deadline is Friday the 24th at 9am EST.

Woodward K. was lynched.

He was the...:

Night 1 Commence! Deadline is the 26th at 9am EST. No idles are needed, please just submit your actions!

good thing i checked the feed today; i would've been inactive for 48 hours if i didnt notice the actions were carried out early.
so on to reads, leeku suggested a lynch on luana, yet didn't act on it, and let woodward die? it's not like he didn't have time to make a decision either. to me, this either means that leeku is a dumb townie, or he's scum partners with luana and bussing. lynch leeku
anyone have other opinions on this?

Did you even read anything in the thread? Check out my answer to Yosaku and you'll see why I lynched woodward. And I'm still pushing for a Luana lynch for her scumminess on day 1. I don't even see what is scummy about that.

i dont honestly care whether you had a reason to lynch woodward. my issue is that you suggested a lynch on luana and didn't follow through with it, especially when the discussion was all about agreeing on someone to lynch for the day. also, your reasons (scumminess and inactivity), while true, are lame af especially considering how others were pushing luana at that point. obvious bandwagon/partnerbus taking advantage of the approaching deadline in my opinion. now that i think about it, luana could just be a scapegoat and not necessarily a mafia partnerbus, but my scumread toward you, leeku, is strong.

But I DID lynch Luana until I realised it wasn't going anywhere and if I didn't change my lynch toward someone else (who I also found to be scummy), I would be lynched instead. I seriously am not understanding your issue with me

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

So Luana still hasn't talked. Interesting.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

First of all you should know that I'm a good stalker and know which of you come online and don't post. *cough* Case C. *cough*

Luana V.: Comes on day 1, says nothing useful, lynches me, disappears. Comes on day 2, says stuff that's already been said, lynches me. If you do disappear again I really hope we lynch you this time. Leaning Scum.

Pierre T.:Solid points, nothing important to note. Neutral.

Uncle Milton: Filler, discusses a few points, and then goes away. A recurring theme in this game so far. Still hasn't said too much to seem town or scum. Neutral.

The Foreman: Again, not enough was said. Neutral

Umberto I.: Solid reasoning all around, kinda leading town, seems like a good player. Posts have been excellent. Extremely Town.

Yosaku D.: A little bit scummier than Umberto but still adding to the discussion and not fillering after your day 1 stuff. Extremely Town.

Case C.: In my opinion trying to be the town leader, although you're kinda too aggressive voting wise to be mafia. Leaning Scum but least likely among the other scum.

Ramone R.: I don't like flavor, and the way you post seems like you don't add anything meaningful to the discussion. Leaning Scum.

Mariss A.: See The Foreman. Neutral

Clarissa W.: As I said I don't know why you lynched me since I explained why I was on woodward day 1. Luana seemed to immediately follow you up on the lynch but I'm not blaming you for that. Editing posts is a no-no for me, and could mean that you're trying too hard to make your posts seem towny. Leaning Scum.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

I'll post a condensed readlist in a few, been having internet problems

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Clarissa W. wrote:
Leeku O. wrote:
Case C. wrote:We should consolidate on a lynch soon rather than idle till deadline. I would suggest Pierre because unlike Marissa and The Foreman he's put out stuff that actually pings my scumdar.

I would suggest Luana for scumminess and inactivity

ajhockeystar wrote:Votecount 1.5
******************************
Woodward K.(3)- Pierre T., Umberto I., Leeku O.
Leeku O.(2)- Woodward K., Luana V.
Luana V.(1)- Austin M.
Pierre T.(1)- Case C.
Uncle Milton(1)- Yosaku D.
The Foreman(0)-
Umberto I.(0)-
Yosaku D.(0)-
Case C.(0)-
Austin M.(0)-
Ramone R.(0)-
Mariss A.(0)-
Clarissa W.(0)-
Not Voting(5)- The Foreman, Ramone R., Mariss A., Uncle Milton, Clarissa W.
******************************
There are 13 alive so it takes 7 to hammer. Plurality applies.
Deadline is Friday the 24th at 9am EST.

Woodward K. was lynched.

He was the...:

Night 1 Commence! Deadline is the 26th at 9am EST. No idles are needed, please just submit your actions!

good thing i checked the feed today; i would've been inactive for 48 hours if i didnt notice the actions were carried out early.
so on to reads, leeku suggested a lynch on luana, yet didn't act on it, and let woodward die? it's not like he didn't have time to make a decision either. to me, this either means that leeku is a dumb townie, or he's scum partners with luana and bussing. lynch leeku
anyone have other opinions on this?

Did you even read anything in the thread? Check out my answer to Yosaku and you'll see why I lynched woodward. And I'm still pushing for a Luana lynch for her scumminess on day 1. I don't even see what is scummy about that.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Yosaku D. wrote:why the hell wasn't someone on Austin are you shitting me

I don't really see HYPO being beneficial at unless we have a night w/ no kills. Actually, that could give scum information on who actually is the jailkeeper/doc so I don't think HYPO is a good strategy at all.

Would like to hear reasoning from Pierre, Umberto, and Leeku as to why they did not switch their vote off of Woodward. Did you still think he was scummy, or did you have another reason that you lynched him?

I'd also like to see some contributions from Uncle Milton, The Foreman, and Marissa.

Hopefully Luana can provide some quality content, and I don't think i've seen Clarissa post at all? i'll re-check since that might be the girl with the green background i'm not sure.

I also disagree with lynching inactives since it gets us next to nothing. There's very little we have to work with from the Woodward lynch yesterday, but i'll take a look and see if I can find anything.

Tbh I really wanted to lynch luana and I still do, the lynch on woodward was to get plurality off of me, which was pretty scummy but I wasnt gonna get lynched just because Luana decided to write one post and go away