Search found 19 matches for Kinso D.

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Butch C. wrote:

Taka T. wrote:
Who do you want then?

I was hoping for others to actually talk so I can decide (eg. Kathi since she has a new sub).

Kinso D. wrote:vote taka

You must be doing this on purpose now....are you even reading my posts???

Evian W. wrote:Like I'm unsure why you think this fact so badly that what I did wasn't an RVS just because I got off after a real life day? Like let's apply logic, what else could I be trying there? Pushing them away from town on the basis of them giving a weird list of reads?

Well what I had in mind was that you could have taken the opportunity of Taka's seemingly controversial readlist for an easy way to seem as if you are proactive and helping town win. But that's not important, what's important is that as long as my points still stand, I have reason to believe you are lying about the fact your vote was a pressure vote. You seem to be trying to drop the whole argument without responding to my points which makes this even more suspicious. If the whole RVS thing is true then you should be able to knock down my points and convince me, which is why I still have reason to believe you are lying about this and you evading my points is making it more suspicious.

Evian W. wrote:As for the second content, seriously.. it was for Pit who had posted about Bart... my posts aren't that confusing i don't even know if at this point you're reading them differently..

I had another look, you were definitely replying to my post which had 2 points towards you. I asked why you had Pit as neutral while Yaichi as scumlean. Then you just randomly mentioned Bart which made no sense. Not sure what you're on about tho, there's no way that was directed to Pit. Here is the quote for reference:

Evian's reply:

Whilst we are on the topic of you apparently targetting this at Pit, I cant find a single post where you have addressed Pit's 5 or 6 questions that he asked you. Quote it for me if you have but otherwise not sure how you are telling me that was for Pit when you seemingly never responded to Pit.

Evian W. wrote:
Moving onwards, your reply to Pit has this questionable thing - you stated that you don't have the neutrality or in between behaviour which alright i agree, but then at the same time you're being neutral to Pit yourself, and then you suddenly going like "oh i understand" is something i don't appreciate much, it's really like you going for perfect townread for Pit because "you understand them".

If by neutral you mean that I never pressed Pit that would be because as of now nothing struck me as weird that requires me to press them. At the same time I am not the kind of person to be stating the obvious and saying that him reading people in detail is townie. Also, I said the "however I understand" part because I talked about how he can tell my stance on people by how I am pressing them, but following that logic there is no way he can tell my stance on those who I havent been pressing so obviously I understand where he is coming from. Your logic about how me understanding them makes them townread me is fundamentally flawed because the only thing that "understanding" would do is show the clarity of the post and that the person fully acknowledges the point, which funnily enough is not alignment indicative.

Evian W. wrote:

Taka T. wrote:My major problem with Evian is that he has been completely avoiding me since I started posting. This is a guy who is prodding people for activity early in the week, telling people to be less useless, asking people questions. He parks his vote on me. When questioned on it (by Butch), he mangles his explanation COMPLETELY and tries to explain that it was a RVS vote. His vote, as of 12 hours before deadline, was still on me.

Big issues with this. I haven't been avoiding you. If there's some post I didn't reply to, then I probably missed something? I agree to the next three things, and then there's the question about the RVS, I don't get why you are so stuck up to believe that it wasn't an RVS. And a question as to the last line (which wasn't necessary to be there? I don't know what you're trying to convey by saying that?) - there's this hypocrisy where you're saying that it wasn't an RVS but are saying that my vote was on you as of 12 hours before deadline?

Fairly sure his point was that you kept your vote for too long to be an RVS lynch? Not quite sure how he's contradicting himself.

Evian W. wrote:

Butch C. wrote:Which is why I don't want either of us to be sent to heaven today. To me, being sent to heaven today is almost like a glorified n1 nightkill but with the ability to talk a little bit more. Which is why I dont want to be sent to heaven this early because I want more time in this game and also because I got slight confidence booster after making the right call not to vote bart (which didnt work out in the end rip). I would rather put in the effort to think about who else is town and a good heaven candidate.

I see this here, and:

Taka T. wrote:vote butch

Escapes your eyes? I don't get this - you're nodding heads over the heaven lynch being a glorified n1 nightkill, yet you just let the post go below your eyes?

umm..because it never went below my eyes? My post was after he voted me so I just expressed why I didn't want to be voted. Unless you're trying to say that I didn't press him for it, I didn't think it was scummy because my point of view of it being a glorified nk wouldn't necessarily be the same for everyone. Which is also why I didn't get what you meant by us nodding heads when it was really just me.

Evian W. wrote:

Butch C. wrote:I understand your point on how Kaiser has basically ignored everyone except Kaiser which would seem scummy. Although looking at his ISOs he did address Pit by expressing a small amount of dissatisfaction on something he said but then he says his reads make Kaiser see Pit as d1 townread. I also don't see a problem with trying to get your scumread lynched because I don't see why mafia would just tunnel Kinso and not also press on someone say Bart. In fact this post in particular was the reason why I got a townlean on Kaiser...

:? At that point, there was little possibility of the fact that a wagon other than Bart could be started. He could easily have been getting a Kinso wagon to 1. Not get into the "you lynched Bart you lynched town" wagon and 2. To get points / fake scumhunt (since that's quite possible/visible there - he literally has to show scumhunting there to fulfil his needs)

I mean while I was deciding a read for Kaiser these points definitely crossed my mind, however they didnt stick because I disagree with the very first bit. When Kaiser started against Kinso with the "something about the reaction just feels, idk off. It should be obvious from reading that Taka is just making annoying shitposts and not an actual readlist. feels wierd. FOS" The only person really going against Bart was Taka, so the wagon was never solidified at that point in time so I would have thought a scum Kaiser would push it to some extent but still go for Kinso in order to smoothly meet the two points you mentioned. I know Yaichi voted Bart too but his reasoning was literally just "bad reaction" which was being questioned (by me). I am also aware you had an FoS on Bart at the time but you had an FoS on Kaiser for the same reason so the pressure on Bart wasn't prominent.

Evian W. wrote:

Butch C. wrote:........? You're joking right? After my points against you that I still want you to answer and also Taka's points + lynch against you and all you felt like doing was "Vote Taka"??? Also the last time I checked the members list (before you posted) it said that you came online about 6 hours or so after AJ commenced heaven face. I thought it was fine because you may just be writing a long post or something, but now all it looks like is that you came online to see Taka say "Vote Butch" so you decided it'll be fine to do the same? It seems clear that you thought about voting Taka before heaven phase began because no one has actually said anything with substance as of yet which means no post would have changed your mind, so then why didnt you do that when you last came on? This makes me believe moreso that you simply did this just because you saw Taka do it...

...I'll just scrap the whole point by saying this much - you're overthinking it. No such complex thing came in my mind. Sometimes I can feel sleepy and choose not to post instead. And really, overthinking isn't the best thing here.

I knew you were gonna say that you felt sleepy, but all you would have done was "Vote Taka" which isn't exactly the most mind-intensive post. And I am fairly certain your decision to vote Taka came from ur impressions in the hell phase and not from something that was said recently (unless you thought "vote butch" was what made you vote Taka which doesnt sound right).

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Kaiser P. wrote:

Kinso D. wrote:

Bart S. wrote:

Kinso D. wrote:Also this pit guy seems to have lynched me and just hasn't appeared since.

Why have you cared so much about one lynch. This is near all that you have said today and you don't even have plur afaik.

If someone lynches me, that means they think I'm scum. I'd like to know why that is and prove them wrong regardless of if I have plurality or not.
You should not only care about the game if you're about to die. That attitude makes games inactive.

You werent defending yourself though. You were Pushing someone who was lynching you, mostly because they lynched you :/

Game 34: Purgatory

Bart S. wrote:

Kinso D. wrote:Also this pit guy seems to have lynched me and just hasn't appeared since.

Why have you cared so much about one lynch. This is near all that you have said today and you don't even have plur afaik.

Game 34: Purgatory

Kaiser P. wrote:

Kinso D. wrote:

Kaiser P. wrote:Im not really sure why. Kinso's reaction just urks me a bit more its hard to explain
Kinso i gave reasoning, your reaction to the shitposting readlist seemed fake and wierd. Read the thread instead of throwing off my read as no reasoning

I mean I get that you find it scummy, but as I said that was my reaction because I though he was being serious.

How can you think it was real. Thats what seems fake about it. and even if you did think it was real, you started questioning his townread on you iirc, which just seems like a scum saying 'im going to disagree with being townread that looks townie' idk how to explain very well it just gives a bad vibe

Kinso D. wrote:Also this pit guy seems to have lynched me and just hasn't appeared since.

Pit had about the same activity as a few others. Why are you specifically targeting him apart from the fact he is lynching you?

Pit B. wrote:Sorry for the inactivity, a post on all my thoughts will be coming shortly.

Also, to clarify, we are in Hell phase right?

That last bit feels like he's asking a question for the sake of asking questions. If you read the thread you will see people voting for scumreads so..
However his later readlists give me a d1 tr on him

gonna do this again because AJ missed it cos he is bad boi unless i maybe just forgot to do it idk
Unvote
Vote Kinso

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Kaiser P. wrote:Im not really sure why. Kinso's reaction just urks me a bit more its hard to explain
Kinso i gave reasoning, your reaction to the shitposting readlist seemed fake and wierd. Read the thread instead of throwing off my read as no reasoning

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Kaiser P. wrote:

Kinso D. wrote:

Taka T. wrote:Pit is now lean scum.

Lock town:
Butch
Pit
Evian

Lean town:
Kathi
Kinso

Scum if Kathi is scum UNLESS Evian is the different alignment as Kinso in which case this is town:
Kaiser

Lean scum:
Pit

Hard lock scum:
Bart

Okay how did you get that instant town read on me? This is interesting I only had 1 post and it was about me liking the theme

something about the reaction just feels, idk off. It should be obvious from reading that Taka is just making annoying shitposts and not an actual readlist. feels wierd. FOS

Game 34: Purgatory

Pit B. wrote:

Taka T. wrote:Lock town:
Butch
Pit
Evian

Lean town:
Kathi
Kinso

Null:
Pit

Scum if Kathi is scum UNLESS Evian is the different alignment as Kinso in which case this is town:
Kaiser

Hard lock scum:
Bart


Discuss

Taka T. wrote:Pit is now lean scum.

Lock town:
Butch
Pit
Evian

Lean town:
Kathi
Kinso

Scum if Kathi is scum UNLESS Evian is the different alignment as Kinso in which case this is town:
Kaiser

Lean scum:
Pit

Hard lock scum:
Bart

Not sure if this sudden shift in reads was a reaction test or what, but alright.
Anyways:
Vote Kinso D.

Game 34: Purgatory

Taka T. wrote:Pit is now lean scum.

Lock town:
Butch
Pit
Evian

Lean town:
Kathi
Kinso

Scum if Kathi is scum UNLESS Evian is the different alignment as Kinso in which case this is town:
Kaiser

Lean scum:
Pit

Hard lock scum:
Bart

Game 34: Purgatory

Game 34: Purgatory

Madam Muchmoney wrote:If Pit and Bart can invade our game, I can invade theirs! Kinso, I thought you had a tail at first for some reason.

Game 34: Purgatory