Search found 18 matches for Ian P.

Game 35: Vengecop

Jean A. wrote:
Frank S. wrote:am i the only one who's noticed that gail hasn't actually defended herself?
she's either said
a) it doesnt make sense for orthinol and oralie to be a scumteam
b) if you lynch one of us and they inspect the other as town what do you do
c) if i am scum orthinol is scum too

orthinol... may actually just be town and bad readswise?
i'll take a look tomorrow, sorry for flaking
lynch gail
ricky really does not look like scum here, but nanny calling out lurkers and the entire game showing up is suspicious as fuck LMAO

OK, but I think killing off one of the people who are actually keeping this dead game alive is kind of a bad idea, especially when we just have vengecops anyways. By "Entire Game" you literally mean me, since I subbed in, and Ricky, since he subbed in. Big Logic.

Just because they are keeping the game alive doesn't automatically mean town. Keeping them alive / vengecop them is what should be done if we want to see if we can actually try them.

Game 35: Vengecop

Nanny G. wrote:Ian are you saying Orthinol is town

No. Specifically what they said about Frank and his townpool including one scum member if he is scum.

Game 35: Vengecop

Orthinol Q. wrote:
Frank S. wrote:townpool: frank/keenan/nanny/tedesco/santo

I think i'm right on all of these. if we only inspect in the below group, I believe we win the game?
Would like to know your guys' thoughts.

Gail S.
Ian P.
Jean A.
Oralie O.
Orthinol Q.
Ricky M.

I think this post is a bad look btw, in this set up you shouldn't give scum info as to who might be copped. Trying to control who is copped is also very beneficial to scum. If Frank flips scum we know at least one other scum is in the town pool he listed here though I think?

+1 this.

Game 35: Vengecop

Is anyone else currently online?

Game 35: Vengecop

Orthinol Q. wrote:Do we think scum is bussing? In set ups this size they usually are, but its very hard to try piece a team together with this level of activity

With this level of activity I doubt scum would bus

Game 35: Vengecop

I am also not entirely against an Oralie lynch.

Game 35: Vengecop

Lindsay L. wrote:Orthinol, Kain, Keenan, Tedesco, Santo

Those are the people we have to decide between if no one else shows up I think

This might come in handy some time in the future I would say (but I'm grasping at straws at this point to be honest). We know Santo is clear - no point in that. Only downside is that I believe no AFK players were named at the time so it neglects them. I'm not good at explaining so tell me if this doesn't make sense.

Game 35: Vengecop

Ian P. wrote:Anyone currently online?

I guess I am alone..

Game 35: Vengecop

Nanny G. wrote:
Ian P. wrote:
Nanny G. wrote:
Oralie, I have a bad feeling, its a gut feeling. Can't put my finger on it.
Nanny G.

Elaborate please? I get that you might have a bad feeling about Oralie but what makes you think they are scum?

Im admittedly bad at mafia, I think I remember not liking Oralie’s posts day 1 especially the scumread on santo was bad

Ok, fair enough. Could you give examples of posts?

Game 35: Vengecop

Anyone currently online?

Game 35: Vengecop

Frank S. wrote:

Nanny G. wrote:
At first I thought the best strategy was to inspect the AFKs on death but now I don't know because say they're clear, then we have an AFK leading town.

We should probably just inspect controversial players / our own scum reads.

I don't think there's necessarily anything WRONG with inspecting an AFK player because it does effectively narrow our lynch pool - just because they're clear doesn't mean they necessarily have to lead town, it just means that we can consider their input as 100% coming from town and don't have to doubt it.
mafia might also just off them which will save the more active townies!

I support this! If we clear any of the currently active people, mafia will kill them which will just leave us with inactive AFK players..

Game 35: Vengecop

ajhockeystar wrote:
Orthinol Q. wrote:
Nanny G. wrote:This game makes me sad.

+1

+2. Tempted to call it off. It's disappointing when people agree to play and say they're gonna be active when they don't