Search found 26 matches for Austin M.

Game 24: Near-Vanilla

PJSalt

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Lol, basically a scum QT in the thread. Game 24 migjt actually win

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

2 points wurf

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Uncle Milton wrote:I cc mafia

Dat moment when this thread gets more active post game than the game itself

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

I am claiming it

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Yosaku D. wrote:fine, i'm FrontieReddo161

Oh i remember him...Kappa

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Uncle Milton wrote:Also I know both of you and your not Drookez lol

yeah coz i am drookez

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

i thought ramone was skarmchikora but w/e. idk i just assumed its not my lack of townie or something that didnt protect me, i just think doc wanted to predict maf nightkill and failed. Also i thought clarissa was a really obvious doc, she did everything that a doc would do and so i guessed her first time lol.

This game reminded me of the average league of legends game. One noob getting carried because the rest of my team kept feeding lmao. (and no i try not to be the guy that blames everything on others xD)

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

portugal ez game ez life

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

like remember willheima? he tried that strat as a townie, got nightkilled night 1 coz no one protected him, kinda dejavu huh

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

lmao yosaku, but yeah i am stating the reason that could have been used by others to pressure you. even if it is your kind of playstyle, i still think that it wasnt quite the right way to play the game as a townie. remember how jennette C did it in game 6? well that was because it was a game with no nightkills. But other games which had nightkills, those who have succeeded with this kind of playstyle are scum because there isnt as much risk (coz you cant exactly kill yourself xD) Eg. Romeo (but you got rekt by fire maf) and Mizuho etc.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Uncle Milton wrote:Sadly yes, and I know him

he kinda just assumed who i was, i never confirmed but i think he is just sure that i am who he thinks i am

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Uncle Milton wrote:Umberto don't reveal me or I'll hurt you :^)

wait so umberto knows who you are?

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

JK actually blocked a scumread lol, he blocked mariss day 1. I guess he took a gamble which i kinda disagree with seeing as it was only day 1. Also, why did you just tell me who you were? XD

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

I knew this game was lost at day 2's lynch lol.

It was quite interesting watching the game from the sides coz it told me many things. Yosaku and umberto, despite being active, made many slips that were even more obvious when i knew who the mafia were. But when i didnt, i did suspect yosaku day 1 and coming on to day 2 (which i then tried to guess the mafia and got them except for umberto so gj) which showed that yosaku could have cracked if pressured. However what mafia did extremely well was keep a message resonant which is: "scum tend to lurk and not help town" which is not true at all but the rest of town were too worried to lose an active guy. However it is frustrating because town didnt even try and pressure any of the actives...not even me. Ultimately this is what led to town's demise. What really annoyed me was the marissa + foreman thing because it should have been fairly obvious that it was one of the two because of how they echod each other. Marissa tried to make an effort but 3 (or 4?) Different people failed to make an effort for the foreman. Even yosaku said that "people should still have a bit of time in their day to post something". That was an extremely missed opportunity but it was because yosaku and umberto at a point in the game where they were so dominant so they literally controlled who got lynched. One of the biggest indicators tho was that i got killed n1 despite there being a JK and a doc which is an extremely big risk. However when the town doc was killed the mafia seemingly didnt target umberto or yosaku, the active ones, despite being a safer and more effective choice than the n1 kill on me. They showed that they are willing to take risks so not killing yosaku or umberto should have been something that allowed you guys to pressure them and maybe bring up other stuff about them. I could probs go on about the mistakes made by town but the post is already too long lol.

I am pretty sure if yosaku is reading this that he wants to know why i suspected him. It was because of your townie play. It was too forced. Honestly nowadays, no one but mafia plays in that kind of style where pretty much all they do day 1 is be nice to everyone and ask them nicely to talk because it tells mafia that "hey i want town to win and i am gonna try hard to rek you" despite not doing any actual scumhunting. In a game with no nightkills, this is a totally fine strategy to use but this game had nightkills so you just put yourself in a place where you just risked your death without accomplishing much. Did the inactives talk after you tried to encourage them? No. Did you need to make a post between every other just to say that you wanted to hear from so and so? No. But why did you do it? To make myself look townie. But did it actually accomplish anything? Lol no. In contrast, although i seemed blatantly townie, it was only because i tried to put forward good points which everyone agreed was good. Notice how i didnt even post that much tho, maybe once or twice a day. Although this isnt enough to say you were scum, this is enough to give me a good excuse to pressure you as much as i can and maybe gather a case against you. Unfortunately i died tho so i could never reach that stage.

Speaking of which, how on earth did you predict that doc and JK werent gonna go on me? Although i critised town a lot, i still have to say that mafia did play very well, especially umberto since the way he played didnt really make me think he was scum until i was told by AJ so kudos to him.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

So is it over now? Can i finally post my rant???

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

lul inb4 jailkeeper targetted the doctor. tbh i'd rather have this happen, i woulda just unleashed all my salt from the eu referendum on you guys xD

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Although my explanation as to why i thought woodwark wasnt scum was wrong, i still think that he aint scummy. But what confuses me is his initial reaction post. He got lynched twice for saying it because of how vague and strange it was and then he finally explained what he was doing. However he said that he thought that his first post was self explanatory. How on earth does saying "i was wondering when someone will pick up on it" explain how he didnt mind jumping on the wagon to pressure and get reactions and also he used unorthodoxed methods to get reactions. He was lynched because of his initial post due to it being scummy. His initial post is considered to be a reaction which turned out to be a scummy reaction which are usually what most town use to get reads. So did he say that he thought it was self-explanatory so he can cover the scumslip? Again there is nothing scummy in his actual explanation and his method he used in early day 1, but the transition between his reaction post and his explanation post seems awfully dark... i'd like woodwark and everyone else to shed some light into this and tell me their thoughts.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Mariss A. wrote:no ones really outright scummy to me, however ill get more reads once everyone start to talk more.

The Foreman wrote:Tbh I agree with Larissa, nobody stands out as particularly scummy to me

But thats the point right? Mafia arent just gonna knock on your door and be like "yo lynch me i am scum". You've gotta pressure and scumhunt so they can slip up and become scummy. Literally you guys are just sitting in the backseat waiting for stuff to come to you. Stuff like this is what inhibits town's progress and part of me is telling me that you guys are intentionally doing so...

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

It's kinda sad how progress gets inhibited by a bunch of inactive people. We are waiting kinda for people like luana and other inactive/lurkers to respond and be productive coz atm that's where most of everyone's pressure is going towards. Pressure is like money, you invest it on someone to get a decent reaction back. If they dont react you just wasted this pressure. This is what i feel is happening right now and day 1 is ending soon so it is starting to be worrying.

The only reason why i didnt think of woodwark as scum is because towards the end of his posts they werent actually filler. He was saying how Umberto (or whoever it was cant remember xD) is tunneling on leeku. He said it in a strange way to make it look fillery but if he rephrased that to something like "umberto you seem to be tunneling on someone who was only randon lynched" it would look like a non-filler post but it literally meant the same thing. Also the fact that he recognised the tunneling shows that his lynch was not intended for a BW coz that is also tunneling if that makes sense. I am just kinda curious why Pierre started going on about how it's ironic and made a big deal of only lynching luana. It's coz i found her the most scummy out of all of them and so did a few others.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Her last visit was at Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:52 pm and her last post was at Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:00 pm. Thats shows that she isnt lurking.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

The Foreman wrote:Read a little on d1, so I know most of what's going on and why everyone is on who they are on

Cool story bro lol, you wanna tell us your thoughts about everyone and stuff? Like seriously it's no good telling us you read a bit of day 1.

I am like 100% sure editting posts is not allowed.

Case, unless luana is lurking, i dont think a 4th lynch (or however many lynches are on her atm) is necessary just coz she's inactive rather than lurking. Well i havent actually checked tho so if she is then an additional lynch is probs justified.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Case C. wrote:Unlynch Leeku

I am an idiot and thought they were claiming Vanilla instead of commenting on the setup. RVS yada yada

I don't think BWing is scummy in RVS because the whole point is to get reactions and see how people react to pressure.

@Woodward who is tunelling on who

I see where you are coming from but i feel that BWing gets false reactions. It makes people self-aware and annoyed making them more angry towards other people which makes them look more scummy (not all the time but thats what i have noticed usually). Also BWing drives them into a state where they are forced to be super defensive which cuts on their ability to put forward their scumhunting analysis on other people.

I guess BW does increase their activity usually and people can post both defense and thoughts in the same post but it didnt look like leeku was gonna lurk anyway and a 3rd or 4th lynch so early seems excessive. Random lynching is probably a better strat day 1.

Now lets get what luana has to say about herself

UL case Lynch Luana

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Umberto pls dont start with the lolicons lol. Yosaku, aj told me not to tell you the maf so early coz then it ruins the game....Kappa.

Idk if luana and case are bandwagoning for the vine or they are legit getting him lynched but idk it just feels like after 2 or 3 lynches on the same guy you dont really add to it unless yoi genuinely think they are scummy. "You tried too hard with that reaction" doesnt seem like a legit reason so honestly its odd to jump so hard on the bandwagon. I'd also like to see what case meant by what he said.

Game 23: Near-Vanilla

Case C. wrote:Lynch Leeku O

Why is it a good idea to claim vanilla so early

lynch case c.

Ayyy bandwagon much? When did he say it's a good idea to claim villy?