Search found 52 matches for Nathaniel E.

Game 29: Guess Who?

If only our game had one terrible scum ffs

Game 28: Guess Who?

molly i dont know why you tunneled me but thats what you get

Game 28: Guess Who?

you guys were bad mrs. grimm was obvious (though i thought it was mrs. grimm + molly lol)

Game 28: Guess Who?

Have fun kiddos good luck town you will need it

Game 28: Guess Who?

And I won't answer your question(s) unless you do what I asked of you

Game 28: Guess Who?

@Lulu L. my bad didn't see that post

However you said you would finish your readlist and that has been unfinished.

@Molly Q. you haven't given me your read on Mrs. Grimm and Aya Y.

This is also not omgus, as you lynch me for no good reason. When I point that out, you just ignore me. When I ask a question for you, you just ignore me.

Also I'd like to know who else is scumreading me aside from the possible and probable Mrs. Grimm + Molly Q. scum team. I have sufficent evidence that I can defintely see that being the case if anyone wants to ask I'll share the evidence with them.

Game 28: Guess Who?

Mrs. Grimm wrote:

Molly Q. wrote:

- your reads don't have content (they don't, just read them. they are like "neutral" or "I'm not really sure" or "agree with everyone else, even when" no one else has a distinct read
- you are incredibly, incredibly defensive

To be honest, I completely agree with those 2 statements. You can't say 'Molly is tunneling Nathaniel' when everything she says about him makes perfect sense. Look at his posts. He turns extremely aggressive when anyone calls him out, which is either a sign of inexperience or scumminess.

Nathaniel E. wrote:Yay when everyone's post is directed towards you and now you have to defend yourself, update your reads, and update the readlist. Mafia is more difficult than life itself

Shut up with my inactivity shit im tired of it

So, you say you aren't tunneling. I am also your main and only scumread. So your saying that the fact you don't look at ANYONE ELSE = not tunneling. Hi Five

I mean if you looked at anyone else maybe me and other people wouldn't say its tunneling but like admit it, if I get lynched and then flip town you won't know what to do eh

Honestly though if Molly flips town then scum will tunnel me in lylo anyway so RiP it was a good try town

I hate this. He keeps telling Molly to 'look at someone else' when she gives plenty of good reasons why she's after him. Saying 'hey look at X instead of looking at what I'm doing that's completely scummy is not a valid defense. I don't know why it feels like Aya is protecting him when Molly, at least to me, is way more rational and makes more sense.
Also, the second red flag, he keeps saying 'if Molly flips town RIP me'. This 'if I predict she flips town before it happens and say that they're gonna lynch me, they won't lynch me' approach is just pathetic. Again, I just find that to be extremely full of shit.
As of right now, I find that Nathaniel is the mafia with a possible partnership with Aya since she's trying to save his ass from the Molly accusations. So unless Nathaniel provides a good answer this time without getting angry and defensive ('Shut up with my inactivity shit im tired of it'), I'm gonna stick to this lynch.
Lynch Nathaniel

"As of right now, I find that Nathaniel is the mafia with a possible partnership with Aya since she's trying to save his ass from the Molly accusations"

As of right now, I find that Mrs. Grimm is the mafia with a possible partnership with Molly since she's trying to agree with her ass on everything she accuses Nathaniel of. Yeah, tell me why your literally the only one who is agreeing with her, and tell me why you said Molly was town for being defensive. Then tell me why you aren't scum (with Molly). Oh wait, answer the first question and your good. Though you won't find a reasonable answer

Game 28: Guess Who?

My Reads:
Mrs. Grimm(0)- Reads honestly don't make any sense and she could be scumbuddies with Molly (it would seem blantly obvious though). The general agreement with Molly and the fact Mrs. Grimm said Molly is Town because she is defensive defintely puts the red lights up for me. Scum/Possible Scumbuddy(s): Molly Q.

Molly Q.(0)- Again, can't gripe how I was inactivity for longer than how long I said I would be, and also can't find a reason how my posts are 'contentless'. Sure there is some filler, but the posts with good information are the posts you ignore. I'd like to think your trying to lead town to scum, but it seems like instead you are tunneling one person (me) with false evidence. Also if you don't think your tunneling then give me two good reads (Mrs. Grimm + Aya Y. is the best) that make logical sense. Scum/Possible Scumbuddy: Mrs. Grimm

Wilma F.(0)- Filler, and said she would talk and contribute before just leaving the game. However, the past three filler people were all town so I'm going to leave her at Neutral.

Lulu L.(0)- Quite defensive, which in itself isn't bad, but only got serious when there was a lynch on her. And as Molly said, with no pressure on her, she is literally nonexistent. Sure the posts are somewhat informative, but I really don't like the fact that she hasn't been here for Five Days. Leaning Scum/Possible Scumbuddy: Molly Q. (look at interactions)

Steveland W.(0)- Semi informative posts, and tries to help town. Maybe some streches of inactivity, but beyond that, some reasonable reads. Leaning Town

Aya Y.(0)- Finally came back and got serious for once. The readlist she gave was quite decent, with reasoning behind each verdict. And even though she is trying to attack Molly for bad reasoning, it could be because she is scum and knows who her scumbuddy is and wants to protect town to make her seem townish. On the other hand, maybe it's just town protecting town. Neutral

Yeah so I mean if you look at what I said, Lulu L. and Wilma F. have not been here for a good chunk of time...and Molly Q. ignores them. Maybe that's some decent reasoning for why I think she is scum. Also, be prepared for Molly to tunnel one of them for inactivity

Game 28: Guess Who?

Yay when everyone's post is directed towards you and now you have to defend yourself, update your reads, and update the readlist. Mafia is more difficult than life itself

I'll defend myself first cause why not

- your reads don't have content (they don't, just read them. they are like "neutral" or "I'm not really sure" or "agree with everyone else, even when" no one else has a distinct read

Ok and your saying other people have reads that don't have any neutrality in them. Following people is not necessarily a scum thing but ok

Shut up with my inactivity shit im tired of it

What else am i supposed to do? Let you and your scum partner win? Or become defensive to prove that I am town? Think the second one is correct.

I appreciate people for trying to knock any common sense into that person, but like seriously "inactivity" is bogus...like what you want me to just leave the game to get subbed like Mrs. Grimm did? No, just because I decided not to post doesn't mean I'm scum it means I either didn't have something I wanted to say or was just lazy...

"and it's not the inactivity that matters"

So, you say you aren't tunneling. I am also your main and only scumread. So your saying that the fact you don't look at ANYONE ELSE = not tunneling. Hi Five

I mean if you looked at anyone else maybe me and other people wouldn't say its tunneling but like admit it, if I get lynched and then flip town you won't know what to do eh

So, I mean your points are utterly false (1. I'm defensive and thats bad [duh I sort of have to be when you lynch me with your first post everytime] and 2. My short strech of 'inactivity' which I have explained 20 times) and that's my reason for lynch Molly Q.

It's not a reason called 'tunneling Nathianel' or 'your reads are bad', in fact its a combo where you don't pay attention to anyone else and base your reads off my 'inactivity' and my 'defensiveness'.

Honestly though if Molly flips town then scum will tunnel me in lylo anyway so RiP it was a good try town

Game 28: Guess Who?

Also, if someone would be kind to compile Guy F.'s reads (too confusing) that would be great

His oog spelled I am not drookez ... everyone guess drookez go

Game 28: Guess Who?

Lulu L. Reads:
Mrs. Grimm - Neutral
Nathaniel E. - N/A
Aya Y. - Neutral
Wilma F. - N/A
Molly Q. - N/A
Steveland W. - N/A
Guy F. - Town (Correct)
Mirror Serena - Scum (Incorrect)


Steveland W. Reads:
Mrs. Grimm - Neutral
Nathaniel E. - Town
Aya Y. - Not Sure
Wilma F. - Town
Molly Q. - Neutral
Lulu L. - Neutral
Guy F. - Neutral
Mirror Serena - Scum (Incorrect)

Mrs. Grimm Reads:
Nathaniel E. - Scum
Aya Y. - Neutral
Wilma F. - Neutral
Molly Q. - Town
Lulu L. - Town/Neutral (?)
Steveland W. - Town
Guy F. - Scum (Incorrect)
Brianna D. - Scum (Incorrect)

Molly Q. Reads:
Mrs. Grimm - N/A
Nathaniel E. - Scum
Aya Y. - N/A
Wilma F. - Scum
Lulu L. - N/A
Steveland W. - N/A

Wilma F. Reads:
Way too weird to read because of all the quoting; please make a list without quotes jeez

Aya Y. Reads:
Pretty sure none unless I wasn’t reading properly

Nathaniel E. Reads:
Mrs. Grimm - Scum
Aya Y. - N/A
Wilma F - Neutral
Molly Q. - Town
Lulu L. - N/A
Steveland W. - Neutral
Mirror Serena - Scum (Incorrect)
Guy F. - Town (Correct)

If I got anything wrong, tell me. I used everyone’s latest reads so it could be changed. I will update my own reads soon, but I would like to comment on the reads I read (could be different now just gonna comment on what I saw)

Lulu L. has to finish her reads, they are incomplete.
Steveland W. has almost no scum reads (which isn’t a bad thing), so I would like to see him give out at least two scum reads in his next read list (there are still two scum iirc).
Same with Mrs. Grimm, and I also want to see the reasoning behind their town/scum reads and whether Lulu is definite town or neutral.
Molly Q. just thinks it’s me + Wilma F., and doesn’t care about anyone else apparently. At least give your reads on everyone else.
Wilma F. + Aya Y. has to make their reads.
My reads are incomplete currently, will need lots of changes

Game 28: Guess Who?

Also honestly people should start reading what other people say (i'm going to do that now) because everyone ignores like everything I say lol

Game 28: Guess Who?

Molly, you are consistently having 0 reason to lynch me? "You went inactive on day 2" "Let me just completely ignore your reads and say they are trash" "Yeah let me just not read what ANYONE ELSE says and just tunnel this guy"

Honestly I'm super tempted to lynch Molly, and not because of omgus. It's absolutely insane that me being 'inactive' day 2 is still the reason for her lynch.

Also I mean even if I don't get lynched now I'll get tunneled by that guy over there in LyLo...

I would like an explanation of your current lynch, because all of your first posts are literally lynching me. And your right, you didn't comment. Your intent on tunneling me. Tell me who else you have set eyes on. No one.

If your explanation is 'inactivity' or 'read up' or 'shitposting', then I think that is just insane. If you say 'you plurshifted', then the answer is: Yes I did, but I was actually quite suprised Mirror Serena flipped town and thought that I had sufficent evidence for a lynch. You on the other hand? Not so sure.

I'm going to make a list of everyone's reads soon, as long as Aya (think thats the last one) makes her reads. [I'll use previous reads unless someone wants to change them right now]

Game 28: Guess Who?

RIP I didnt even look at who died before I sent that

So Mrs. Grimm, who are your 'scumteam' reads? Me and Who? Or have you changed your mind?

Game 28: Guess Who?

Mrs. Grimm wrote:Ok now for my initial reads:
Lulu L.: Argumentative, direct, not fillery. Definitely Town
Molly Q.: Defensive. That's the only thing I can say. Leaning Town
Guy F.: I usually find people who jump on inactives to be scummy. It is a bad play to just assume inactivity = scumminess, and generally mafia would want to divert attention from themselves/a scummy partner by focusing on inactives. Leaning Scum
Wilma F.: Has very early reads, even though no one had said anything meaningful yet. Goes on to defend herself quite well. Neutral
Brianna D.: Complete filler. Hasn't said 1 useful thing all game. Scum
Steveland W.:

Mrs. Grimm wrote:Oops, previous post was sent accidentally.
As I was saying
Steveland W.: Goog discussion, nothing negative to say about him. Solid  points he brings up mean he is probably Town.
Lulu L.: One of the most active people in game. Although nothing in particular was towny, nothing was scummy either. Neutral.
Aya Y.: Not Much to say because not much has been said. Neutral
Nathaniel E.: Nope. Disagree with almost all of your posts. (Except for when you said Mrs. Grimm disappeared.) Scum.

Not sure if the Mrs. Grimm account is just cursed or what, but what are these reads I see here...
======================================================================
For one, you dont even have Mirror Serena and you have Brianna. Seems weird.
======================================================================
LULU L. IS BOTH NEUTRAL AND DEFINITE TOWN <---
======================================================================
Guys, Molly is defensive. MOLLY IS DEFENSIVE... are you reads just broken or are you trying to make a scummy first impression?
======================================================================
When Guy F. is the only one who lynches Mrs. Grimm, and Mrs. Grimm is the only one who thinks he is scum. Also, Mrs. Grimm doesn't attack Molly for attacking "inactivity". Seriously man, if your town or scum rethink your reads.
======================================================================
Not sure where got Wilma F. having the first reads...
======================================================================
Gonna ignore the dead-person read for now
======================================================================
Solid points means Steveland is defintely town. And your saying Guy F. and Molly haven't made solid points as well??? I mean you could argue against Molly, but Guy has made some excellent points. Why praise Steveland for excellent points and not anyone else?
======================================================================
Congrats, Aya Y. has not said a single useful thing either, and your considering her neutral. Yet you said Brianna was scummy.
======================================================================
Definitely don't believe you read all my posts. Probably just hopped on the "Nathaniel E. is shitposting" bandwagon. Also, tell me where you disagree with me.
======================================================================
So your reads say me and Guy F. are a scumteam? Is that what I see? Please explain all your reads cause I have 0 clue what any of them mean.

Also please look at what I actually said instead of ignoring what I said like Mirror Serena did.

Game 28: Guess Who?

Lulu L. wrote:

Nathaniel E. wrote:

Lulu L. wrote:So here are my thoughts on the player in the game as of this moment. I hope you do read it all, but if not, I will provide a verdict at the end of each player. I'm using Mastin's guide to scumhunting to help me with this so I will be separating each player into 3 categories: Interactions, Tone and Motive. Starting with the least amount of posts to most (approx):

Mrs.Grimm:
Interactions - Mentioned Molly several times in her early posts, but nothing of much importance. Pointed out Wilma out of the blue in her first post Day 2, again, not much to gain from.
Tone - Now this is the interesting part. Mrs.Grimm went from actively asking for content, lynching those without much contribute and asking Wilma why she disappeared to disappearing from the game herself. I have no idea why, and if it is real life issues, she should have at least posted something when she came on.
Motive - From this point of view, I actually find her to be quite townie. Her posts doesn't seem to have any mafia intentions.
Verdict: Neutral - Should not be lynched (yet) due to lack of interactions

Aya:
Interactions- Seems to "townread" Nathaniel, mainly based on his activity. Interesting that she never commented on any of his "helpful" posts though. Also there was this post where she said something along the line of "town member would feel obligated to post after subbing in too" (referring to Steveland). At first I thought the post was townie as it was sorta like a "voice of reason" but then I was thinking about it again then realized it might be because she didn't want  another lynch on Steveland. Not sure what to think about that.
Tone- Pretty consistent. She gives me this "town mediator" vibe if you know what I mean i.e. not attacking much, but giving good opinions herself. Usually when I feel like this they are scum, but that feeling is kinda weak with her. Need to see more posts.
Motive- Again, pretty neutral to me. Nothing screams scum, but no posts in particular is screaming town to me either.
Verdict: Neutral (like really Neutral). Need to see more posts.

You know what I'm just gonna drop that categorized thing cause it's really time consuming. However, I will keep all 3 of them in mind in the following posts.

Guy F: So far, I really like Guy's posts. He had been pushing those he find scummy (a townie thing), but with strong reasoning to support his claim. This to me is very townie like. Usually, scum would lynch but not follow up (such as lynching and moving on to other players and ignoring the replies). This is not the case with Guy. Honestly, I don't have much to say about him. His posts are very townie like and if he somehow is mafia, then he really is playing an excellent game.
Verdict: Town

Mirror Serena: To me she seems very reactionary and hasty in her lynch, reads and decision. Let me explain. Well, her seems to only target Brianna only because Brianna lynched her. What I mean here is that had Brianna did the same thing but say on another player, I doubt she would even lynch Brianna at all. To me, the lynch is justified, yet it seems that it only happened because Brianna targeted her. Then she lynched Molly, because uhm... she didn't defend well against Nathaniel? You need to explain more of that. Furthermore, it just seems like she lynched Molly because Molly said Mirror Serena should be lynched. I also agree about what others have posted regarding Aya, I can't really see why her posts out of others have been increasingly getting better. This does not help that she literally says "YOU DIDN'T EVEN CHECK TO SEE IF WHAT YOU SAID WAS TRUE". Saying she is lazy and "can't expect every post to be detailed" doesn't help tbh.
Verdict: Scummy

I will take a break here before I continue with the other four players, just to clear my head and let you guys comment whether or not you agree.

Interesting why you are using a guide to help you scumhunt seems fishy

Why does it seem fishy?

Also, why are there only four players in your analysis? Do you not have an opinion on anyone else, or are they the most townie/scummy to you?

Quoting directly from my post, "I will take a break here before I continue with the other four players, just to clear my head and let you guys comment whether or not you agree." Is the question why these 4 first? If so, I already stated I will start with those that have fewer posts cause they are faster.

======================================================================

You say Mrs. Grimm is townie because she is a hypocrite because she lynches for activity when she is inactive. Though I do agree, if Mrs. Grimm was scum I feel like she would confirm herself when she had one lynch on her. Maybe a bored townie, but definitely not helpful

======================================================================

Agreeing that Aya needs more posts, though I don't see where she says she town reads me. Also, some mafia would not attack and just give opinions so that they wouldn't be noticed as much. Though most of the time she just points out stuff  

She consistently says "Nathaniel should not be lynched". Saying "good source of activity and helpful posts" may not directly imply a town read, but the point is that she doesn't think you are scum.

======================================================================

I would really like your opinion on everyone else, especially Molly. I don't know why, but I feel like a Mirror Serena + Molly Q. scumteam is completely possible, as Molly has been literally ignoring the fact Mirror Serena has more filler posts than me.

"finally I'd like to note that a mirror serena lynch is fine at this point, as her most recent posts also have little to no content, despite her saying "I finally have time to be active" now."

Molly says that a Mirror Serena lynch is fine, and backs up the reasoning with 1 sentence. Also it seemed sketchy when Mirror Serena lynched Molly, mainly because no one believed Molly was scum except maybe Wilma up to that point. I just have a feeling.

I don't think I can finish it before deadline, but I will finish my 4 reads tomorrow.

Comments in Bold.

I see, thank you for responding. By the way I think tommorow is night, unless we can get an extend from AJ (which would be helpful if you are reading this AJ)

Game 28: Guess Who?

Lulu L. wrote:So here are my thoughts on the player in the game as of this moment. I hope you do read it all, but if not, I will provide a verdict at the end of each player. I'm using Mastin's guide to scumhunting to help me with this so I will be separating each player into 3 categories: Interactions, Tone and Motive. Starting with the least amount of posts to most (approx):

Mrs.Grimm:
Interactions - Mentioned Molly several times in her early posts, but nothing of much importance. Pointed out Wilma out of the blue in her first post Day 2, again, not much to gain from.
Tone - Now this is the interesting part. Mrs.Grimm went from actively asking for content, lynching those without much contribute and asking Wilma why she disappeared to disappearing from the game herself. I have no idea why, and if it is real life issues, she should have at least posted something when she came on.
Motive - From this point of view, I actually find her to be quite townie. Her posts doesn't seem to have any mafia intentions.
Verdict: Neutral - Should not be lynched (yet) due to lack of interactions

Aya:
Interactions- Seems to "townread" Nathaniel, mainly based on his activity. Interesting that she never commented on any of his "helpful" posts though. Also there was this post where she said something along the line of "town member would feel obligated to post after subbing in too" (referring to Steveland). At first I thought the post was townie as it was sorta like a "voice of reason" but then I was thinking about it again then realized it might be because she didn't want  another lynch on Steveland. Not sure what to think about that.
Tone- Pretty consistent. She gives me this "town mediator" vibe if you know what I mean i.e. not attacking much, but giving good opinions herself. Usually when I feel like this they are scum, but that feeling is kinda weak with her. Need to see more posts.
Motive- Again, pretty neutral to me. Nothing screams scum, but no posts in particular is screaming town to me either.
Verdict: Neutral (like really Neutral). Need to see more posts.

You know what I'm just gonna drop that categorized thing cause it's really time consuming. However, I will keep all 3 of them in mind in the following posts.

Guy F: So far, I really like Guy's posts. He had been pushing those he find scummy (a townie thing), but with strong reasoning to support his claim. This to me is very townie like. Usually, scum would lynch but not follow up (such as lynching and moving on to other players and ignoring the replies). This is not the case with Guy. Honestly, I don't have much to say about him. His posts are very townie like and if he somehow is mafia, then he really is playing an excellent game.
Verdict: Town

Mirror Serena: To me she seems very reactionary and hasty in her lynch, reads and decision. Let me explain. Well, her seems to only target Brianna only because Brianna lynched her. What I mean here is that had Brianna did the same thing but say on another player, I doubt she would even lynch Brianna at all. To me, the lynch is justified, yet it seems that it only happened because Brianna targeted her. Then she lynched Molly, because uhm... she didn't defend well against Nathaniel? You need to explain more of that. Furthermore, it just seems like she lynched Molly because Molly said Mirror Serena should be lynched. I also agree about what others have posted regarding Aya, I can't really see why her posts out of others have been increasingly getting better. This does not help that she literally says "YOU DIDN'T EVEN CHECK TO SEE IF WHAT YOU SAID WAS TRUE". Saying she is lazy and "can't expect every post to be detailed" doesn't help tbh.
Verdict: Scummy

I will take a break here before I continue with the other four players, just to clear my head and let you guys comment whether or not you agree.

Interesting why you are using a guide to help you scumhunt seems fishy

Also, why are there only four players in your analysis? Do you not have an opinion on anyone else, or are they the most townie/scummy to you?

======================================================================

You say Mrs. Grimm is townie because she is a hypocrite because she lynches for activity when she is inactive. Though I do agree, if Mrs. Grimm was scum I feel like she would confirm herself when she had one lynch on her. Maybe a bored townie, but definitely not helpful

======================================================================

Agreeing that Aya needs more posts, though I don't see where she says she town reads me. Also, some mafia would not attack and just give opinions so that they wouldn't be noticed as much. Though most of the time she just points out stuff

======================================================================

I would really like your opinion on everyone else, especially Molly. I don't know why, but I feel like a Mirror Serena + Molly Q. scumteam is completely possible, as Molly has been literally ignoring the fact Mirror Serena has more filler posts than me.

"finally I'd like to note that a mirror serena lynch is fine at this point, as her most recent posts also have little to no content, despite her saying "I finally have time to be active" now."

Molly says that a Mirror Serena lynch is fine, and backs up the reasoning with 1 sentence. Also it seemed sketchy when Mirror Serena lynched Molly, mainly because no one believed Molly was scum except maybe Wilma up to that point. I just have a feeling.

Game 28: Guess Who?

Molly Q. wrote:if I'm supposed to respond to your reads post then I like how you explained your lynches but I don't see a lot of YOUR content in it. I see just a lot of agreeing with other people and neutral reads, which is a little scummy to me. If it's this post...

If it's your most recent post... I think it's that in hindsight... first of all I never hated you for not talking for a day. you were inactive for a large chunk of day 2 and I missed the post where you said you weren't going to be active. please. You were also inactive for longer than that and that was kinda fishy (that explains my first point which I guess you didn't understand??). The rest of your post is just you being SALTY AS FUCK because you are being scumread LOL it's funny because you don't understand how busy I am rn

finally I'd like to note that a mirror serena lynch is fine at this point, as her most recent posts also have little to no content, despite her saying "I finally have time to be active" now.

Additionally I think we should check in on Mrs. Grimm, aj isn't subbing her so she's clearly doing something...

just going to format this so it's easier to read
====================================================================

Absolutely terrible reasoning. In the post, you attack me on misinformation.
1. I was not inactive for a large chunk of day 2. In fact, I was only not there on Saturday and Sunday.
2. If you read on Page 4 in one of my posts, I say "AJ I wont be here on the 10th/11th for a heads up..."
3. I don't see how that is fishy at all.
4. Sure I'm salty cause your reasoning is absolute trash.
5. Just because someone has no content in their post doesn't mean they are scum. Maybe the player is just not that good at Mafia, or they try but do not meet your expectations. I try to give my reads, but you just completely ignore what I say in them and instead attack me off it.

=====================================================================

Also, I noticed Mirror Serena lynched Molly Q.? Seems sketchy. I have a feeling she is trying to "help" me by defending me, so I don't lynch her. She also is probably lynching Molly Q. because when I flip town, Molly will use 'filler' and 'inactivity' to lynch Mirror Serena.

=====================================================================

"Guy has been doing a lot of good scumhunting and as of rn I would say he is my biggest tr"

So in this your saying that Guy is your biggest tr, except that's been repeated multiple times. However, that's not my biggest concern. Maybe he is your biggest tr because he doesn't suspect you?

======================================================================

With your posts you are also trying to attack on activity..."Aya- This was harsh on the filler aspect
4 of her 7 posts have been on day 1, and mainly in RVS, with that, you can't expect her to have 6/7 posts with content. (Yeah I know she filleted day 2 but I feel like it's still harsh)"

======================================================================

"I don't think what I did was anything scummy. Plurality was on me. And I thought. I know I'm town, which means it would be bad for town if I die. I don't think I should die." So you are saying that it would be bad for town if you died, yet you post nonsense before you got plurality and then you follow Guy.

=====================================================================

"Nathaniel- While Nathaniel is very helpful I feel like you exaggerated this a bit." You are saying I'm helpful, but not explaining why. It seems like you are buddying me, but for the purpose so that Plurality stays on me.

=====================================================================

By the way for Mirror Serena, this is what I meant by you ignoring the second half of my post. Let me recap:

"So because i agree with the fact they have been filler, let me quickly find all the things this person has said [gonna ignore confirm post]

#1 Im not comfortable with someone having land in their name
how come you get to be a country

Lynch Steveland W.

#2 unlynch Steveland

I wouldnt complain about having miramusosisa lynched today
i really dont have anything to say that hasnt already been said so ill go to a handstand in the corner

#3 Sorry I've had a ton of school shit thrown at me this week

One thing i'd like to say about the post above, is that you ask this question to Guy as if inactivity is the only reason I would be lynched and is also a bad reason. However you lynched me after Guy lynched me. What was your reason?

If its that im inactive, then you are being a hypocrite in this post
If its that you are hopping on a bw, then dont do that
If its another reason, why are you assuming that Guy is lynching me for inactivity

I WILL TRY AND BE ACTIVE OK ;__:

#4 gonna agree with Guy here. What changed your mind?
And because pressure is fun

Lynch Brianna D.

#5 Molly you are saying I have no content so I guess you don't see what I'm doing as content and you expect me to have a full read list half way through day 2

Also plurality is on me I don't really appreciate that

#6 Molly I don't think you understood the purpose of that post
It wasn't be saying inactivity is a bad reason. It was me questioning Brianna asking Guy why he lynched despite her also lynching me and then unlynching

But tbh Guy and Wilma are both doing a great job of saying what I wanted to say and saving me from typing too long paragraphs. I'm gonna keep my lynch for now but it may be changed because I don't like dying

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Gives me a cringe from just looking at this
2. As you can see I'm going to get serious now cause it gave me a cringe and I don't like cringes
3. That just sounded like Mirror Serena

Anyway Post #1 is a RVS post which is legit, even though it was sort of past the RVS Stage.

Post #2 is an Unlynch in a RVS. Wait what did I just type??? Ok, then the person backs it up with “I can’t complain with the person being lynched to be lynched” and then says “I have nothing to say that hasn’t already been said”. Um...there is 1. Lots of stuff to say and 2. Unlynch in RVS? Then practically bandwagons? What?

Post #3 is literally a reason why the person hasn’t been active at all (ok). Then the person backs it up with this which I’m going to requote because it’s hilarious. “If its that im inactive, then you are being a hypocrite in this post” (Really now we are calling people hypocrites? Maybe they had a reason too) “If its that you are hopping on a bw, then dont do that” (You really don’t wanna be lynched eh) “If its another reason, why are you assuming that Guy is lynching me for inactivity” (It’s no other reason ok get it straight we scumread you for your filler and inactivity, but mostly filler in my case)

Post #4 is literally a bandwagon...wait what. A bandwagon??? “If its that you are hopping on a bw, then dont do that” Oh please. “then you are being a hypocrite in this post” Yep. You’re right on the mark. Also great attempt to plurshift.

Post #5 is “Molly you are saying I have no content so I guess you don't see what I'm doing as content and you expect me to have a full read list half way through day 2” Yep your right again. NO ONE SEES WHAT YOUR DOING AS CONTENT. Yep, we also expect you to at least have ONE (ONE UNO 1) read...nope. Also I love the reaction of plurality on you. Excellent.

Post #6 is “Molly I don't think you understood the purpose of that post
It wasn't be saying inactivity is a bad reason. It was me questioning Brianna asking Guy why he lynched despite her also lynching me and then unlynching.” Yes. In lynching Brianna, you 1. Plurshifted 2. Bandwagoned 3. Was a hypocrite. The questioning part? Just a self-defense so people don’t quote “bandwagon” onto you. Good job.

Honestly, after actually looking into depth of this I’m cringing and laughing."

=====================================================================

After looking at Mirror Serena's past activity, and my previous reasoning, I will decide to:

Lynch Mirror Serena

Is this a plurshift? Yes. Do I have reasoning? I think so. If someone convinces me that Mirror Serena is actually town then I will unlynch her. Good luck convincing me

Game 28: Guess Who?

Lulu L. wrote:So Nathaniel has plurality and I wonder how he will react to that. I thought Brianna was quite scummy for randomly unlynching, so I didn't mind her lynched. Anyways, player by player analysis coming soon! <3

I'm wondering too
I'm waiting for Molly's response
I'm waiting for Mirror Serena's response
Though I guarantee at least one of them won't respond

Anyway if anyone else thinks I'm scum please explain why I'd like to know

Game 28: Guess Who?

I was at a math competition today morning so can we not fucking hate on me for literally not talking for a day (aka Molly).

Molly Q. wrote:
i disagree, although I like your analysis of the situation. I have plenty of reasons to still be lynching Nathaniel. The main assumption that you are making is that his posts are useful, and you imply that this is not debatable. Actually, this is not true. For example, just on this page, from top to bottom:

- reminded me that he was inactive because he left for a few days (but didn't note that he was inactive for a longer time than that)
- said that I was attacking him for his inactivity, I was attacking him for his SUDDEN inactivity once he WAS NOT A FOCUS OF THE MAIN CONFLICT to AVOID ATTENTION. let's read people
- quotes a post of mine and asks me clarifying questions (I guess this one is ok)
- notes that I SAID SOMETHING and that HE WILL LOOK AT IT (lol if this isn't useless I don't know what is)
- then he finally does reads after I've been pressuring him to do any content at all for the last few in game days! wow! BUT then he kinda just agrees with a lot of my reads and doesn't add much stuff new, so...

yeah so basically your entire argument was based off of this assumption that his posts were not kinda just passively fine with what's going on, which you are wrong about.

- reminded me that he was inactive because he left for a few days (but didn't note that he was inactive for a longer time than that)

explain what you mean

- said that I was attacking him for his inactivity, I was attacking him for his SUDDEN inactivity once he WAS NOT A FOCUS OF THE MAIN CONFLICT to AVOID ATTENTION. let's read people

chill out i literally wasnt here for a day and your using that as REASONING. of course others are inactive and...nope, no hate on them. starting to believe this flawed reasoning is a bit

- notes that I SAID SOMETHING and that HE WILL LOOK AT IT (lol if this isn't useless I don't know what is)

guess what? i have a LIFE. maybe you should get one

- then he finally does reads after I've been pressuring him to do any content at all for the last few in game days! wow! BUT then he kinda just agrees with a lot of my reads and doesn't add much stuff new, so...

????????????? 1. i didnt look at your reads at all. 2. i explained why i wasnt here 3. your valueing my filler over complete inactivity. maybe i should just go watch march madness all day and just forget about this game. how about that wow

btw this reaction was great ill just sum it up in case you dont wanna read: pissed at terrible reasoning

anyway also since Mirror Serena is my main SR, I'm going to ask her why she didn't answer why her posts were questionable on all levels.

ok just read up again and wait...did she just ignore the second part of my post...literally just attacked me on the fact my reasoning wasn't enough to tr/sr people, but literally just ignores everything i threw at her. Explanation?

Game 28: Guess Who?

come on ppls in like 3 hours i expect at least 2 posts from different people

Game 28: Guess Who?

im tired but i'll assess Steveland's reads anyway

note: not quoting the long paragraph for obvious reasons

Gonna start with the bottom cause its easier to look at

guy f. - neutral read so no comment

Lulu L - semi-agreed on this. i do believe that he/she has just been pointing out stuff, and not really trying to contribute to scumhunting. her longest posts were also defensive (agreed), but a townie might also try to defend themselves like that.

Molly q - i mean know molly is 'semi-tunneling' against me, but they stated their reasons (albeit flawed but still did state them). they have given some in-depth explanations (but does keep saying look at my previous posts which gets annoying).

wilma f - honestly the main reason im always neutral read on them is because im lazy and don't read the long pargraphs with quotes like right beside them (like pls don't quote everything i don't like to read). anyway, i do believe they are trying to find scum, but don't really give an explanation of their scum read...

aya y - agreed on the part where you said they are filler, would like more activity from them for sure [why is there no tag method].

gonna ignore myself for obvious reasons unless someone wants me to actually comment about their read on me

mrs. grimm - no read apparently so uh i guess no comment

and finally the person you lynched aka mirror serena:

So because i agree with the fact they have been filler, let me quickly find all the things this person has said [gonna ignore confirm post]

#1 Im not comfortable with someone having land in their name
how come you get to be a country

Lynch Steveland W.

#2 unlynch Steveland

I wouldnt complain about having miramusosisa lynched today
i really dont have anything to say that hasnt already been said so ill go to a handstand in the corner

#3 Sorry I've had a ton of school shit thrown at me this week

One thing i'd like to say about the post above, is that you ask this question to Guy as if inactivity is the only reason I would be lynched and is also a bad reason. However you lynched me after Guy lynched me. What was your reason?

If its that im inactive, then you are being a hypocrite in this post
If its that you are hopping on a bw, then dont do that
If its another reason, why are you assuming that Guy is lynching me for inactivity

I WILL TRY AND BE ACTIVE OK ;__:

#4 gonna agree with Guy here. What changed your mind?
And because pressure is fun

Lynch Brianna D.

#5 Molly you are saying I have no content so I guess you don't see what I'm doing as content and you expect me to have a full read list half way through day 2

Also plurality is on me I don't really appreciate that

#6 Molly I don't think you understood the purpose of that post
It wasn't be saying inactivity is a bad reason. It was me questioning Brianna asking Guy why he lynched despite her also lynching me and then unlynching

But tbh Guy and Wilma are both doing a great job of saying what I wanted to say and saving me from typing too long paragraphs. I'm gonna keep my lynch for now but it may be changed because I don't like dying

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Gives me a cringe from just looking at this
2. As you can see I'm going to get serious now cause it gave me a cringe and I don't like cringes
3. That just sounded like Mirror Serena

Anyway Post #1 is a RVS post which is legit, even though it was sort of past the RVS Stage.

Post #2 is an Unlynch in a RVS. Wait what did I just type??? Ok, then the person backs it up with “I can’t complain with the person being lynched to be lynched” and then says “I have nothing to say that hasn’t already been said”. Um...there is 1. Lots of stuff to say and 2. Unlynch in RVS? Then practically bandwagons? What?

Post #3 is literally a reason why the person hasn’t been active at all (ok). Then the person backs it up with this which I’m going to requote because it’s hilarious. “If its that im inactive, then you are being a hypocrite in this post” (Really now we are calling people hypocrites? Maybe they had a reason too) “If its that you are hopping on a bw, then dont do that” (You really don’t wanna be lynched eh) “If its another reason, why are you assuming that Guy is lynching me for inactivity” (It’s no other reason ok get it straight we scumread you for your filler and inactivity, but mostly filler in my case)

Post #4 is literally a bandwagon...wait what. A bandwagon??? “If its that you are hopping on a bw, then dont do that” Oh please. “then you are being a hypocrite in this post” Yep. You’re right on the mark. Also great attempt to plurshift.

Post #5 is “Molly you are saying I have no content so I guess you don't see what I'm doing as content and you expect me to have a full read list half way through day 2” Yep your right again. NO ONE SEES WHAT YOUR DOING AS CONTENT. Yep, we also expect you to at least have ONE (ONE UNO 1) read...nope. Also I love the reaction of plurality on you. Excellent.

Post #6 is “Molly I don't think you understood the purpose of that post
It wasn't be saying inactivity is a bad reason. It was me questioning Brianna asking Guy why he lynched despite her also lynching me and then unlynching.” Yes. In lynching Brianna, you 1. Plurshifted 2. Bandwagoned 3. Was a hypocrite. The questioning part? Just a self-defense so people don’t quote “bandwagon” onto you. Good job.

Honestly, after actually looking into depth of this I’m cringing and laughing.

Anyway mirror serena, if you don’t talk in the next day or two about what i just said you’re in for a nice quote “bandwagon”. Think you should research what a bandwagon is before you come back.

Game 28: Guess Who?

Honestly to reduce inactivity: If someone will not be available to play during a specific time frame or date, state that in a post and the reason. This will at least try to help the inactivity (hopefully lol).

otherwise you are known as a lurker

Will look at Steveland's reads later (or maybe now but i'm tired)

Game 28: Guess Who?

greaty we might have another completely inactive day where scum just watches town fail

i dont want to critize people for this, but honestly people need to start talking. i tried to get everyone to give their reads, but currently only a select few (molly, wilma, guy i think is it) have given them.

Mirror Serena said he/she would talk and be more active...uh yeah what happened to that idea fam

Steveland has a grand total of good old 6, albeit informative but still 6  

Mrs. Grimm literally has disappeared off the face of the Earth

Concrete SRs: none
Leaning toward scum/suspicious: Mirror Serena (pls), Mrs. Grimm (disappeared), Aya Y. (sorta filler)
Neutral: Steveland W. (meh), Wilma F. (you leave stuff half not explained but its still decent material), Lulu L. (not sure)
Leaning toward town: Molly Q., Guy F. (informative posts. molly q. could be possible scum team with lulu but seems like molly is just town who is critizing for a "tunnel attempt".)
TRs: none concrete

hopefully next time i come on i see 3 people aside from me molly and guy talk

Game 28: Guess Who?

Molly Q. wrote:I apologize, I missed the post that said you would be leaving for a few days but I still feel as though your activity was decreased from before. I have three scumreads (wilma serena and you, maybe add aya later if continues with bad posts)  because I am leaning toward scum on all of them. Clearly not all of them are scum but it's just showing the people who are most likely scum. I understand why this is confusing. I think you and wilma could be partners because neither of you pressure each other and are kinda just passively fine with whatever the other person does, which I find extremely scummy. I have explained my town reads but here:

Guy and Lulu have been making extremely informed posts with very good arguments against their scumreads in a very readable manner. For highlight posts check out Lulu's post condemning Wilma somewhere in the last day, you'll notice how well-thought out her argument is.

Steveland, Grimm, and Aya are all neutrals. Steveland and Grimm MUST increase their activity today but Aya was town but then her posts became progressively less informed and more just I'm spewing out bullshit to make it seem like I'm contributing. They are all probably town but aren't active enough / I'm not confident enough to say for sure.

Let's talk, people, we need to lynch scum today.

I get the fact we practically ignore each other but know that Wilma was the first lynch on me, and personally I thought he/she was going to push on me (maybe but he/she just completely died in activity). Sure I'm ignoring him/her, as with most people who have paragraphs I dont understand.

I see you did said Lulu had a informative post will look at that later.

edit: is it all her posts combined or one of them in specific @molly