Search found 171 matches for Ed S.

Game 32: Farmer's Hydra (Part 2)

Shoot Emmy

Game 31: Separated Scum

Marilyn M. wrote:Ed S.- 0 points
Being a cause of a town death (voting for a mislynch or incorrect vigilante shot): -2 x 7

>x7

I'm counting this record among my achievements.

Points Leaderboard

ajhockeystar wrote:#31: chatter seel- 11 points
#38: Fenrir Aesir- 8 points

This is not okay.

Game 31: Separated Scum

~~Not my fault you're all scummy~~

At least I'm getting a definite two points from guessing and not being guessed.

Game 30: Separated Scum

Maria S. wrote:
Yuzo K. wrote:#hirokididnothingwrong

if Lila didn't have complete garbage shots I feel like town would have won. Not even that she shot town but that she shot a few of the least scummy town

Meanwhile in our game....

Ed S. - Search Tumblr_n59f04Q8Ry1tu7965o1_500

Said it already, but well played to people. Especially O O.-during yesterday (when G31 was in its 3rd LyLo) I had a conversation with AJ that basically amounted to me flip-flopping between Titus and Marilyn until he told me "Well, both are wrong."

~~I see Hiroki is online. Please don't abuse me or Lila.~~

Game 31: Separated Scum

Y'wanna go mate?

Shoot O O. And Kodama (again).

Game 30: Separated Scum

Wow, thanks.

Well played to everyone tbh.

Game 31: Separated Scum

Also, I can publicly cry about AJ tormenting me with flips.

See the multiple spoilers on the Kodama flip and the (appreciated but) many, many HYPES on the Wilkinson flip. There was also a moment at the very start of Day 3 where he had something like:

"The death of last night was:

Magnus D. the Vanilla Townie
and
Ed S. the Compulsive Vigilante

This means:
(Spoiler) Just trolling :^ (Spoiler)"

TL;DR AJ made me cry with these reveals.

Game 31: Separated Scum

I wonder what Mr. Cheeves and Kazalie think of this game.

I always wonder what the first few to die think, but Kazalie especially given her D1 vote on Mona and right after the Kazalie flip I felt bad. I felt bad after all the shots but I probably should have given Kazalie more opportunities to post (that was part of my rationale for not shooting Wilkinson/Mr. Honcho that night) and Kazalie came on a few times D2 while I was waiting for people and I kept wondering what she'd have said.

Game 31: Separated Scum

Well, I was correct in not expecting to be able to get on again prior to now.

Wilkinson don't feel bad

I choked and can't Vig to save my life (literally).

Mona forgetting she was scum is me every time I play as solo scum and it's always amazing. Honestly, I think that's part of what helps to balance this theme.

Can AJ put us all in the same game next cycle tbh?

Game 31: Separated Scum

Ed S. wrote:I am no longer on a Wii U, though my ability to post remains sporadic. However, Rhonda has finally posted her readlist and something about it stands out to me.

Brace yourself for a theory of a scumteam pairing.

A Mona+Rhonda+??? scumteam was the theory in the back of my mind...

<snip>
I think if this is in fact the scumteam, the third member of the group is one of Wilkinson/Roderick.

I feel slightly better about myself for this, although it was based on flawed logic (w/ the inspections not matching up). I think it would have turned out differently too if you'd had more free time and for some reason I feel like it would have been a lot of fun. (Hint hint AJ put us in the same game next time.)

Game 31: Separated Scum

And also Mona deserves MVP. Imo she did well w/ pressure and iirc she never had an actual vote made against her.

Game 31: Separated Scum

As long as I'm alone and nobody can abuse me, I'd like to point out that I was going to originally shoot Rhonda n2 and Mona n3.

Game 31: Separated Scum

Game 31: Separated Scum

Don't put me in a kingmaker ever again.

I don't react to these situations well.

Game 31: Separated Scum

Lynch Wilkinson A.

and go offline to avoid the incoming wave of Ed hate.

I need to find Lila C.

Game 31: Separated Scum

I went back to check. you did mention it and I was bad and didn't notice. Thank you for restating it though.

I see Wilkinson's been on again. With <36 hours to deadline I'm uncertain when I can next get online, so I'll wait for a while to see if he's typing something but I intend on hammering if he's not. I don't know if he's trying the same thing Rhonda did as far as not saying anything goes, but it obviously didn't work for Rhonda so unless he's trying to wifom it (which town should have no reason to do) I don't see why he's yet to respond.

Game 31: Separated Scum

Maria S. wrote:
Maria S. wrote:Also mona u say you think both kodama and rhonda are both scum, so then why are you so torn? Surely in your perspective you have absolutely no worries in lynching either one?

I should probably make my point clearer here, you're absolutely right that hammering right now is silly coz you just cut precious discussion time. You already have your lynch on kodama and you say you're torn between kodama and rhonda yet you know you cant lynch rhonda anyway (you can, just not a good idea). So why the need to say you're torn between the two? Its a fair assumption that you arent changing your kodama lynch and you even said that both are scum in your eyes so in your perspective you're fine with either one getting lynched. It feels as though you said it in order to perhaps make us believe you arent buddying with rhonda. I mean it's fine to give reasons as to why you think both are scum which i thought is great but its the opening bit that i am not liking.

Here's a question I had for Mona actually that I don't think got answered due to Maria's death.

Game 31: Separated Scum

Also Wilkinson: no stalling on it this time, because I will lynch you if we get to deadline and you haven't given said reasons.

Game 31: Separated Scum

So far, I see very little I want to ask people that I have not asked already. Something that has occurred to me though:

Let's assume that, as I proposed D3, that Mona and Rhonda were scum who knew each other. Roderick would thus be the third scum, and he commented that Mona and Rhonda were likely 1 scum and 1 town. It's likely in my opinion that he inspected Rhonda, and the implication from that comment would then be that he had at least inspected Mona as well (despite his continual push on Wilkinson). It's possible that he was trying to postpone a read on Mona to inspect her that night, but at the time he said this there was a somewhat realistic chance that he could move the lynch off of Rhonda.

If Roderick inspected Mona and got her as town, this comment makes sense for him to make and it also means he doesn't know his second partner. This could steer him away from a popular lynch and towards forming a wagon that wouldn't gain traction. However, he was on some level pushing for Wilkinson's lynch so this clearly wasn't a concern of his and supports that he actually inspected Wilkinson as town.

If Roderick inspected Mona and got her as scum, he may have reason to worry that she is the hidden miller. It still makes sense for him to comment on them being 1 scum and 1 town in this case. However, given that Roderick seemed to be trying to soft to Rhonda that he inspected her, it's unlikely he thought she was the hidden miller. He'd thus try to soft to Mona as well, but there's nothing in his ISO that seems like that.

If Roderick didn't inspect Mona, it's possible he was postponing a read on her until he inspected her, but this has problems for reasons stated above. His ignores his thoughts on Mona/Rhonda as town/scum in favor of a PoE read during D4 (which could be cause for alarm), but I'm not expecting Mona to be able to answer for something Roderick did.

Wilkinson, the few reasons I haven't lynched you yet are wanting to read back and wanting your defense. I'm almost done reading back, so if you have any reasons as to why you are town or Mona is scum the time to list them would be now. And then comes the obvious follow up question for if you do: Why did you not mention these things earlier in the game?

Game 31: Separated Scum

Here's a "why did you" then: Why did you not bring up the concern with interaction theory earlier?

There was no threat of a No Lynch in sight on any day, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from.

What you pointed out what that Kodama was "taking advantage of" your being scummy to "bs" a lynch. What I'm failing to see is how a lynch is bs if it's because someone found you scummy.

I'm beginning the reread.

Game 31: Separated Scum

I have little time at the moment, so all I can say is that I do intend to read the game in full and compile questions to ask.

Game 31: Separated Scum

Ed S. wrote:
After multiple requests for Wilkinson to go into more detail with his reads, we've only gotten one liners again. He's handwaving away his reaction to Kodama's vote with "oh didn't see it was pressure rip." Other than that, his only "scumread" is Roderick, and he doesn't actually call Roderick scum, just notes his activity and that he's potentially the other lynch target. I'm glad he's still posting and responding, but that fact in itself is NAI now, as he'd feel pressured to contribute regardless of alignment.

Wilkinson, you said Kodama was taking advantage of your scumminess to push you. AKA lynching you because you were scummy. This was an incorrect interpretation, but even if it were right what's wrong with lynching someone scummy? And why wouldn't you proceed to explain prior scummy actions? That, in my opinion, is better to try and say that you don't approve of someone's reasoning (*cough* Mr. Cheeves). You came across as trying to discredit the person instead of their read, which doesn't answer for anything you've done that was scummy.

I fixed typos. But this still applies and I've bolded areas of interest.

Game 31: Separated Scum

Also hold up.

Wilkinson A. wrote:
Why would you consider me and Roderick interactions in deciding scumteams when he's a traitor and I would be a normal Mafia?

I can't tell if this is an attempt to fake townslip or not, but you realize all scum in this are Traitors, right?

Game 31: Separated Scum

Well, I was hoping someone would cc because I felt like that would be easier, but ¡nope!

The problem I have with Roderick voting Wilkinson as a sacrifice is that even if he inspected Wilkinson and got a Guilty inspect, he could have at most by day three only inspected one of Rhonda or Kodama and there are few scenarios I can imagine where Roderick starts pushing Wilkinson's lynch the second he subs in (unless Kodama is the hidden miller and he inspected Kodama+Rhonda). The point about Wilkinson's contrast between his willingness and unwillingness to lynch makes sense, though.

As far as bussing goes, there's no doubt that it happened (either Mona bussed Roderick or Wilkinson bussed Rhonda, regardless of if the bussing was intentional or not).

So, question to Wilkinson: You said during D3 that "it's LyLo and we have to lynch" and used this as motivation to vote Rhonda. Yesterday was also LyLo, so why the change in attitude re: lynching?

Also Wilkinson, you're pointing out Mona talking about interactions when that's something I've been doing since Day Three and that's been happening since Day Two (see Maria's original interpretation of my read on Roderick). Why is it only now, when it pertains directly to you, that you have a problem with it?

Time to read tf back.